How the IRS' crime-fighting force took on immigration and other issues in 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — The crime-fighting arm of the IRS spent less time tracking down tax evaders this year, instead picking up some new responsibilities, such as helping withimmigration enforcementand supportingNational Guard deploymentsin two Democratic-led cities.

IRS Criminal InvestigationsChief Guy Ficco spoke with The Associated Press about how the agency is juggling its work on new Trump administration priorities with its core mission of tax enforcement. The little-known agency has been doing more with fewer staff, according to its annual report, released on Thursday.

Ficco, who served as the head of the IRS Criminal Investigations unit during both the Biden and Trump presidencies, described his workforce as "resilient" after Department of Government Efficiency cuts to the unit earlier this year.

"I think, by anyone's account, 2025 has been challenging in the sense that there's always a challenge when administrations change," Ficco said in the interview.

When combined with layoffs and retirements this year, Ficco said, "we're down a significant amount of our personnel now."

There was a 10% reduction in personnel for the unit in fiscal year 2025 — going from 3,474 field agents and professional staff in 2024, down to 3,143 in 2025.

The agency has also had to manage a larger workload, sending about 25 agents to support the National Guard after Trump deployed the soldiers to help address crime in Washington, D.C.

In September, the agents also began helping with National Guard operationsin Memphis. In February, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem asked toborrow IRS Criminal Investigation workersto help with her agency's immigration operations.

Since May, the IRS unit has deployed 250 agents to track down undocumented people and issue deportation orders, Ficco said. IRS-CI said its agents have helped ICE with arrests, detentions, and deportations.

Meanwhile, the agency boosted the number of investigations into corporate and financial institution fraud, money laundering and a host of other crimes. However, one area that has seen a drop-off is investigations for "abusive tax schemes" or tax evasion.

IRS-CI issued 834 prosecution recommendations for tax crimes in fiscal year 2025. But tax evasion cases dropped to 34 in 2025, down from 92 in 2024, and there were 17 prosecutions recommended this year compared to 55 in 2024.

Some cases IRS-CI had previously recommended for prosecution are waiting for action from the DOJ, and "ultimately may get prosecuted in the near future," Ficco said.

How the IRS' crime-fighting force took on immigration and other issues in 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — The crime-fighting arm of the IRS spent less time tracking down tax evaders this year, instead picking ...
Kilmar Abrego Garcia freed from federal immigration detention, his attorney's office says

PHILIPSBURG, Pa. (AP) —Kilmar Abrego Garciawas freed from immigration detention on a judge's order Thursday while he fights to stay in the U.S., handing a major victory to the immigrant whose wrongful deportation to anotorious prisonin El Salvadormade him a flashpointof the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement to let Abrego Garcia go immediately, writing that federal authorities had detained him again after his return to the United States without any legal basis.

Abrego Garcia's attorney's office confirmed he was released just before 5 p.m., the deadline the judge gave the government for an update on Abrego Garcia's release. His attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, earlier told The Associated Press that Abrego Garcia plans to return to Maryland, where he has an American wife and child and where he has lived for years after originally immigrating to the U.S. illegally as a teenager.

Abrego Garcia had been held at Moshannon Valley Processing Center about 115 miles (185 kilometers) northeast of Pittsburgh.

Sandoval-Moshenberg said he's not sure what comes next, but he's prepared to defend his client against further deportation efforts.

"The government still has plenty of tools in their toolbox, plenty of tricks up their sleeve," Sandoval-Moshenberg said, adding he fully expects the government to again take steps to deport his client. "We're going to be there to fight to make sure there is a fair trial."

The Department of Homeland Security sharply criticized the judge's decision and vowed to appeal, calling the ruling "naked judicial activism" by a judge appointed during the Obama administration.

"This order lacks any valid legal basis, and we will continue to fight this tooth and nail in the courts," said Tricia McLaughlin, the department's assistant secretary.

Sandoval-Moshenberg said the judge made it clear that the government can't detain someone indefinitely without legal authority and that his client "has endured more than anyone should ever have to."

Abrego Garcia, with an American wife and child, has lived in Maryland for years but entered the U.S. illegally as a teenager. An immigration judge ruled in 2019 that Abrego Garcia, aSalvadoran national,could not be deported to El Salvadorbecause he faced danger from a gang that targeted his family. When he wasmistakenly sent therein March, his case became a rallying point for those who oppose President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement actions.

A court later ordered his return to the United States. Since he cannot be removed to El Salvador, ICE has been seeking to deport him to aseries of African countries. His federal suit claims the Trump administration is illegally using the removal process to punish Abrego Garcia for the public embarrassment caused by his deportation.

In her order releasing Abrego Garcia, Xinis wrote that federal authorities "did not just stonewall" the court, "They affirmatively misled the tribunal." The judge was referencing the successive list of four African countries that officials had sought to remove Abrego Garcia to, seemingly without commitments from those countries, as well as officials' affirmations that Costa Rica withdrew its offer to accept him, a claim later proven untrue.

"But Costa Rica had never wavered in its commitment to receive Abrego Garcia, just as Abrego Garcia never wavered in his commitment to resettle there," the judge wrote.

Xinis also rejected the government's argument that she lacked jurisdiction to intervene on a final removal order for Abrego Garcia, because she found no final order had been filed.

Separately, Abrego Garcia is asking an immigration court to reopen his case so he canseek asylumin the United States.

He is also criminally charged in Tennessee, where he has pleaded not guilty tohuman smuggling. He has asked the federal court todismiss the case, arguing the prosecution is vindictive. His defense attorney in Tennessee, Sean Hecker, declined to comment.

A judge in that case has ordered an evidentiary hearing after previously finding some evidence that the charges "may be vindictive." The judge also noted several statements by Trump administration officials that "raise cause for concern," including a statement by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that seemed to suggest the Justice Department charged Abrego Garcia because he won hiswrongful deportation case. ___

Loller reported from Nashville and Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press reporters Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington and Claudia Lauer in Philadelphia contributed to this report.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia freed from federal immigration detention, his attorney's office says

PHILIPSBURG, Pa. (AP) —Kilmar Abrego Garciawas freed from immigration detention on a judge's order Thursday while he ...
China's new 'condom tax' draws skepticism and worries over health risks

China will soon start collecting a value-added tax on contraceptive drugs and products for the first time in over three decades, a move aligned with Beijing's effort to get families tohave more childrenafter decades of limiting most to one child.

"Contraceptive drugs and products" will not be tax-exempt as of Jan. 1, according to the country's newest value-added tax law. Products such as condoms will be subject to the usual 13% value-added tax imposed on most products.

While state-run news outlets have not widely highlighted the change, it has been trending on Chinese social media, drawing ridicule among people who joked they'd have to be fools not to know that raising a child is more expensive than using condoms, even if they are taxed.

More seriously, experts are raising concerns over potential increases in unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases due to higher costs for contraceptives. The ruling Communist Party's past "one-child" policy was enforced from about 1980 until 2015 with huge fines andother penaltiesand sometimes withforced abortions. In some cases, children born over the limit were deprived of an identification number, effectively making them non-citizens.

The government raised the birth limit to two children in 2015. AsChina's populationbegan to peak andthen fall, it was lifted to three children in 2021. Contraception has been actively encouraged and easily accessed, even for free.

"That's a really ruthless move," said Hu Lingling, mother of a 5-year-old who said she is determined not to have another child. She said she would "lead the way in abstinence" as a rebel.

"It is also hilarious, especially compared to forced abortions during the family planning era," she said.

In 2024, 9.5 million babies were born in China, about one-third fewer than the 14.7 million born in 2019, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. That's despite a higher-than-usual birth rate driven by a traditional preference to give birth in the Year of the Dragon, according to Chinese astrology.

As deaths have outpaced births in China, India overtook it as the world's most populous country in 2023.

The effect of the tax "on encouraging higher fertility will be very limited. For couples who do not want children or do not want additional children, a 13% tax on contraceptives is unlikely to influence their reproductive decisions, especially when weighed against the far higher costs of raising a child," said Qian Cai, director of the Demographics Research Group at the University of Virginia.

Still, imposing the tax is "only logical," said Yi Fuxian, a senior scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

"They used to control the population, but now they are encouraging people to have more babies; it is a return to normal methods to make these products ordinary commodities," Yi said.

As is true in most places, most responsibility for birth control in China falls to women. Condoms are used by only 9% of couples, with 44.2% using intrauterine devices and 30.5% female sterilization, followed by 4.7% male sterilization, according to research released by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2022. The rest use the pill or other methods.

Given the authorities' longstanding invasive approach to their personal lives and bodies, some women are offended by the authorities' effort to again influence their personal choices about childbearing.

"It is a disciplinary tactic, a management of women's bodies and my sexual desire," said Zou Xuan, a 32-year-old teacher in Pingxiang in China's southern province of Jiangxi.

There is no official data on the scale of China's annual condom consumption and estimates vary. A report released by IndexBox, an international market intelligence platform, said China consumed 5.4 billion units of condoms in 2020, marking the 11th straight year of increase.

Experts have expressed worries that reduced condom use could add to public health risks.

"Higher prices may reduce access to contraceptives among economically disadvantaged populations, potentially leading to increases in unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. Those outcomes could, in turn, lead to more abortions and higher health-care costs," said Cai, the director.

China has one of the world's highest numbers of abortions, with 9 million to 10 million annually in 2014-2021, according to its National Health Commission. Experts say the actual number could be higher, with some seeking treatment at underground clinics. China stopped publishing its abortion data in 2022.

Sexually transmitted infections have also been rising, despite a decrease during the COVID-19 pandemic years, with over 100,000 gonorrhea patients and 670,000 syphilis patients in 2024, according to data from the National Disease Control and Prevention Administration.

The number of patients living with AIDS and HIV infections has also been rising, especially among older Chinese, reaching about 1.4 million in 2024.

China's new 'condom tax' draws skepticism and worries over health risks

China will soon start collecting a value-added tax on contraceptive drugs and products for the first time in over three d...
US national park gift shops ordered to purge merchandise promoting DEI

The Trump administration is expanding itscrackdown on diversity, equity and inclusionby ordering national parks to purge their gift shops of items it deems objectionable.

The Interior Department said in a memo last month that gift shops, bookstores and concession stands have until Dec. 19 to empty their shelves of retail items that run afoul ofPresident Donald Trump's agenda.

The agency said its goal is to create "neutral spaces that serve all visitors." It's part of a broader initiative the Trump administration has pursued over the last year to root out policies and programs it says discriminate against people based on race, gender and sexual orientation — an effort that has led some major corporations and prominent universities toroll back diversity programs.

Conservation groups say the gift shop initiative amounts to censorship and undermines the National Park Service's educational mission. But conservative think tanks say taxpayer-funded spaces shouldn't be allowed to advance ideologies they say are divisive.

Employees of the park service and groups that manage national park gift shops say it's not clear what items will be banned. They didn't want to speak on the record for fear of retribution.

A debate over what's acceptable for park gift shops

"Our goal is to keep National Parks focused on their core mission: preserving natural and cultural resources for the benefit of all Americans," the Interior Department said in a statement. The agency said it wants to ensure parks' gift shops "do not promote specific viewpoints."

Alan Spears, the senior director for cultural resources at the National Parks Conservation Association, said removing history books and other merchandise from gift shops amounts to "silencing science and hiding history," and does not serve the interests of park visitors.

Other groups called the review of gift shops a waste of resources at a time ofstaffing shortages, maintenance backlogs and budget issues.

Stefan Padfield, a former law professor who now works with a conservative think tank in Washington, said there is no way to defend the government's promotion of "radical and divisive" ideologies through the sale of books and other items, though he said the challenge for the Trump administration will be in deciding what is acceptable and what isn't.

"Now, are there going to be instances of the correction overshooting? Are there going to be difficult line-drawing exercises in gray areas? Absolutely," said Padfield, the executive director of the Free Enterprise Project at the National Center for Public Policy Research.

The order is open to interpretation

All items for sale at parks and online are supposed to be reviewed for neutrality. That includes books, T-shirts, keychains, magnets, patches and even pens.

But the memo issued by a senior Interior Department official didn't give any examples of items that could no longer be sold, leaving the order open to interpretation. No training sessions have been offered to park service employees.

Some parks had already completed their reviews, finding nothing to add to the list.

On display this week at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia were items featuringFrederick Douglass. At the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park store in Atlanta, there were various books on the Civil Rights Movement and a book for children about important Black women in U.S. history. For sale online was a metal token for the Belmont-Paul Women's Equality National Monument.

There already is a thorough process for vendors to get merchandise into national park stores. Items are vetted for their educational value and to ensure they align with the themes of the park or historical site.

National parks in the spotlight

The park service in recent weeks faced criticism when it stoppedoffering free admissionto visitors on Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth, while extending the benefit to U.S. residents on Flag Day, which also happens to be Trump's birthday next year.

Earlier this year, the Interior Department's ordered parks to flagsigns, exhibits and other materialsit said disparaged Americans. That order sparked debate about books related to Native American history and a photograph at a Georgia park that showed the scars of a formerly enslaved man.

In one of hisexecutive orders, Trump said the nation's history was being unfairly recast through a negative lens. Instead, he wants to focus on the positive aspects of America's achievements, along with the beauty and grandeur of its landscape.

Mikah Meyer knows that beauty well after a three-year road trip to visit all 419 national park sites. He said part of the mission of his travels, which he shared on social media and in a documentary, was to illustrate that parks are welcoming to the LGBTQ+ community.

That message aligns with his business, Outside Safe Space, which at its peak was selling stickers and pins featuring a tree with triangle-shaped, rainbow-colored branches to more than 20 associations that operated multiple park stores. His items started to be pulled from some stores after the executive orders were issued earlier this year.

"How is banning these items supporting freedom of speech?" Meyer said.

US national park gift shops ordered to purge merchandise promoting DEI

The Trump administration is expanding itscrackdown on diversity, equity and inclusionby ordering national parks to purge ...
How the IRS' crime-fighting force took on immigration and other issues in 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — The crime-fighting arm of the IRS spent less time tracking down tax evaders this year, instead picking up some new responsibilities, such as helping withimmigration enforcementand supportingNational Guard deploymentsin two Democratic-led cities.

IRS Criminal InvestigationsChief Guy Ficco spoke with The Associated Press about how the agency is juggling its work on new Trump administration priorities with its core mission of tax enforcement. The little-known agency has been doing more with fewer staff, according to its annual report, released on Thursday.

Ficco, who served as the head of the IRS Criminal Investigations unit during both the Biden and Trump presidencies, described his workforce as "resilient" after Department of Government Efficiency cuts to the unit earlier this year.

"I think, by anyone's account, 2025 has been challenging in the sense that there's always a challenge when administrations change," Ficco said in the interview.

When combined with layoffs and retirements this year, Ficco said, "we're down a significant amount of our personnel now."

There was a 10% reduction in personnel for the unit in fiscal year 2025 — going from 3,474 field agents and professional staff in 2024, down to 3,143 in 2025.

The agency has also had to manage a larger workload, sending about 25 agents to support the National Guard after Trump deployed the soldiers to help address crime in Washington, D.C.

In September, the agents also began helping with National Guard operationsin Memphis. In February, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem asked toborrow IRS Criminal Investigation workersto help with her agency's immigration operations.

Since May, the IRS unit has deployed 250 agents to track down undocumented people and issue deportation orders, Ficco said. IRS-CI said its agents have helped ICE with arrests, detentions, and deportations.

Meanwhile, the agency boosted the number of investigations into corporate and financial institution fraud, money laundering and a host of other crimes. However, one area that has seen a drop-off is investigations for "abusive tax schemes" or tax evasion.

IRS-CI issued 834 prosecution recommendations for tax crimes in fiscal year 2025. But tax evasion cases dropped to 34 in 2025, down from 92 in 2024, and there were 17 prosecutions recommended this year compared to 55 in 2024.

Some cases IRS-CI had previously recommended for prosecution are waiting for action from the DOJ, and "ultimately may get prosecuted in the near future," Ficco said.

How the IRS' crime-fighting force took on immigration and other issues in 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — The crime-fighting arm of the IRS spent less time tracking down tax evaders this year, instead picking ...
Kilmar Abrego Garcia freed from federal immigration detention, his attorney's office says

PHILIPSBURG, Pa. (AP) —Kilmar Abrego Garciawas freed from immigration detention on a judge's order Thursday while he fights to stay in the U.S., handing a major victory to the immigrant whose wrongful deportation to anotorious prisonin El Salvadormade him a flashpointof the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement to let Abrego Garcia go immediately, writing that federal authorities had detained him again after his return to the United States without any legal basis.

Abrego Garcia's attorney's office confirmed he was released just before 5 p.m., the deadline the judge gave the government for an update on Abrego Garcia's release. His attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, earlier told The Associated Press that Abrego Garcia plans to return to Maryland, where he has an American wife and child and where he has lived for years after originally immigrating to the U.S. illegally as a teenager.

Abrego Garcia had been held at Moshannon Valley Processing Center about 115 miles (185 kilometers) northeast of Pittsburgh.

Sandoval-Moshenberg said he's not sure what comes next, but he's prepared to defend his client against further deportation efforts.

"The government still has plenty of tools in their toolbox, plenty of tricks up their sleeve," Sandoval-Moshenberg said, adding he fully expects the government to again take steps to deport his client. "We're going to be there to fight to make sure there is a fair trial."

The Department of Homeland Security sharply criticized the judge's decision and vowed to appeal, calling the ruling "naked judicial activism" by a judge appointed during the Obama administration.

"This order lacks any valid legal basis, and we will continue to fight this tooth and nail in the courts," said Tricia McLaughlin, the department's assistant secretary.

Sandoval-Moshenberg said the judge made it clear that the government can't detain someone indefinitely without legal authority and that his client "has endured more than anyone should ever have to."

Abrego Garcia, with an American wife and child, has lived in Maryland for years but entered the U.S. illegally as a teenager. An immigration judge ruled in 2019 that Abrego Garcia, aSalvadoran national,could not be deported to El Salvadorbecause he faced danger from a gang that targeted his family. When he wasmistakenly sent therein March, his case became a rallying point for those who oppose President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement actions.

A court later ordered his return to the United States. Since he cannot be removed to El Salvador, ICE has been seeking to deport him to aseries of African countries. His federal suit claims the Trump administration is illegally using the removal process to punish Abrego Garcia for the public embarrassment caused by his deportation.

In her order releasing Abrego Garcia, Xinis wrote that federal authorities "did not just stonewall" the court, "They affirmatively misled the tribunal." The judge was referencing the successive list of four African countries that officials had sought to remove Abrego Garcia to, seemingly without commitments from those countries, as well as officials' affirmations that Costa Rica withdrew its offer to accept him, a claim later proven untrue.

"But Costa Rica had never wavered in its commitment to receive Abrego Garcia, just as Abrego Garcia never wavered in his commitment to resettle there," the judge wrote.

Xinis also rejected the government's argument that she lacked jurisdiction to intervene on a final removal order for Abrego Garcia, because she found no final order had been filed.

Separately, Abrego Garcia is asking an immigration court to reopen his case so he canseek asylumin the United States.

He is also criminally charged in Tennessee, where he has pleaded not guilty tohuman smuggling. He has asked the federal court todismiss the case, arguing the prosecution is vindictive. His defense attorney in Tennessee, Sean Hecker, declined to comment.

A judge in that case has ordered an evidentiary hearing after previously finding some evidence that the charges "may be vindictive." The judge also noted several statements by Trump administration officials that "raise cause for concern," including a statement by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that seemed to suggest the Justice Department charged Abrego Garcia because he won hiswrongful deportation case. ___

Loller reported from Nashville and Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press reporters Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington and Claudia Lauer in Philadelphia contributed to this report.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia freed from federal immigration detention, his attorney's office says

PHILIPSBURG, Pa. (AP) —Kilmar Abrego Garciawas freed from immigration detention on a judge's order Thursday while he ...

Lauren Hersh speaks during a rally in support of the victims of Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 03, 2025 Credit - Andrew Harnik—Getty Images

This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME's politics newsletter. Sign uphereto get stories like this sent to your inbox.

The most unwilling sorority in the country met three months ago on the rooftop of a law firm, just a block away from the White House's campus. Survivors of convicted sex offenderJeffrey Epsteinand his accompliceGhislaine Maxwellmingled under the September dusk. Some were meeting each other for the first time. They had ostensibly gathered to make posters for the next day'srallyat the Capitol, but something more meaningful unfolded. Slowly, and without many words, the survivors came to understand their shared trauma and see around them a support network they didn't know they needed. The realization seemed to harden their resolve, and jelled into one of the most efficient political movements to hit Washington in decades.

"These victims have spoken. They've been very clear about who has caused them harm, and we need to believe these women," says Lauren Hersh, who founded World Without Exploitation to combat human trafficking and sexual exploitation in 2016. She was the organizer of the gathering, where she served as poster-board distributor and marker replacer. She is also one of the strategists whose efforts on behalf of the women on that roof and those like them helped upended the first year of President Donald Trump's second term.

In short order, these women helped force the hand of Congress, Trump, and all Americans to move toward disclosing the sins of Epstein and Maxwell—and possibly others in power. By Dec. 19, the Department of Justice must, by a bill passed by Congress and signed into law by Trump, disclose what it knows about the sex trafficking operations that sprawled across years and states. Three times this month, judges have sided with those who have asked to see previously secret grand jury records, in part opened because of the Trump-backed measure. And on Thursday, Senate Democratswroteto Justice's internal watchdog asking for an independent check to make sure everything is handled properly.

It has been a strikingly effective public affairs campaign, leading to a reversal that left even the most skeptical watchers in awe of the speed at which Republican reticence to engage on the Epstein saga evaporated. And yet, even among the champions of transparency, there is a lingering uncertainty about what exactly they might finally see come the deadline. After all, the law exempts materials that may identify victims or compromise ongoing investigations, and Trump has ordered a second look at the cases to see if certain politically active players were given special treatment.

"Your guess is as good as anybody else's," Hersh tells me. "We don't actually know what's going to come to light."

In the span of months, the pressure campaign yielded what other causes might have spent decades chasing. The billboards in targeted congressional districts forced lawmakers to go on the record with support—or not—for transparency. A constant shuttle of survivors to Capitol Hill for one-on-one meetings with anyone potentially standing in their way. An unexpected viral public service announcement that pierced Monday Night Football. A last-minute switch in Trump's attitude toward disclosure. A forcedvotein the House and a shockingly quick capitulation in the Senate. All of it came together in the last few months to prove that, at least in this case, Washington will heed constituents' demands.

"For far too long, the survivors were kept siloed, sidelined, and silenced. And when they came together, they broke the silence collectively," Hersh says. "Ultimately, their collective voice really cracked open the public conversation, which exerted pressure on Congress."

Lauren Hersh speaks during a rally in support of the victims of Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 03, 2025<span class= Andrew Harnik—Getty Images" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" />

For years, the women were told there was no way the whole trove of information about Epstein would ever see the light of day. There were too many powerful and connected men allegedly involved. The survivors included minors, making any disclosures even dicier. Epstein, who firstfacedcriminal charges in 2006 related to sexual exploitation of minors, seemed to be a master at dodging accountability for a sex trafficking ring that involved bold-faced names and billionaires. He killed himself in a jail cell while he was awaiting more charges in 2019.

But things changed last year, as Trump was working his way back to the White House. Images of Trump and Epstein became ubiquitous again. Trump was running around the country,suggestingthat if voters put him back in the White House, he was "inclined" to release the Epstein files. It was bait for his MAGA base convinced that Epstein's past could entangle the likes of Bill Clinton or Bill Gates. And it worked.

But once back in office, Trump balked. He said disclosing what the government knew would hurt victims, unfairly name unproven co-conspirators, and embarrass tangential figures. That argument was especially jarring to many of Trump's true believers, who remain convinced a cabal of elites has been taking advantage of their status. With Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene leading the charge, a handful of House Republicans joined Democrats in forcing the full body to take a vote on a disclosure bill. (Greene has since announced plans to resign from Congress next year after a very public break with Trump.)

Still, the march to this point has been uneven. And it's been one that Hersh's organization was not necessarily built to serve. As the largest anti-trafficking network in the nation—200 member organizations and counting—it runs a survivor bootcamp to help former victims tell their stories to shape policy going forward. But one of the participants this summer was an Epstein survivor who confessed to being exhausted by the return of Trump.

"This moment is deeply painful and distressing," she told Hersh as talk in the commentariat turned to a potential Maxwellpardon. She felt, frankly, alone.

Hersh understood there was only one response: "We're gonna bring people together."

That retreat begat the idea of a Sept. 3 rally. Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, a Kentucky Republican and a Silicon Valley Democrat, were working on a bipartisan maneuver that would force into the open whatever the Department of Justice had in its filing cabinets. Survivors would speak beside lawmakers. It was an event destined to draw headlines.

But it was also potentially combustible. So the night before, Hersh and her pals at Boies Schiller Flexner, a powerhouse law firm, invited the survivors to the rooftop over on New York Avenue here in D.C. "There was this instant sisterhood that was really beautiful," Hersh said. Survivors of other unspeakable circles of exploitation got word of the evening and joined in solidarity. Among themselves, they developed an informal rallying cry:Alone I'm fearful, but together we are feared.

It also was an opportunity for the organizers to privately convey a warning to the survivors. "Everybody is going to want to divide you in this moment. If we're going to be successful, there can be no division amongst you," Hersh told them.

The next day on the steps of the U.S. Capitol, survivors took their turns attaching their names and faces to horrible experiences at the alleged hands of Epstein, Maxwell, and their comrades. It was one of the most moving and upsetting moments of advocacy in recent years, one that made it impossible for a lot of lawmakers to ignore.

"The truth is, Epstein had a free pass. He bragged about his powerful friends, including our current President, Donald Trump. It was his biggest brag, actually," survivor Chauntae Davies said.

From there, the survivors understood they had to keep the pressure on Congress. They were consistently on the Hill, lobbying lawmakers to rethink their fealty to Trump and his shove-it-down attitude toward the investigative files.

But the strategists understood they had to keep going. Hersch and her team hired film teams in Los Angeles and New York to interview survivors. But when they sat down to look at the footage collected on soundstages in those coastal caverns, they realized their best material came not from the scripted readings, but from the impromptu observations. "You don't really hear much of the script in the actual PSA because what ended up happening in the space was just so moving. These women came together, the raw emotion that surfaced because of the bond that they shared was so powerful," Hersh said months later. Initially, the ad was just going to go online. Once it went viral, it caught the eye of a donor—Linkedin co-founder Reid Hoffman—who helped it air during Monday Night Football, hours before House lawmakers were set to vote.

"There are about 1000 of us. It's time to bring the secrets out of the shadows. It's time to shine a light into the darkness," the survivors said in the one-minute spot.

Separately, the groups started to lease billboards in congressional districts where they thought they could force Republicans to either defect or defend the ongoing stonewalling from Justice. In Colorado Springs, where Rep. Lauren Boebert serves and deceased Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre still has family, drivers saw the "Courage is Contagious"messagingalong I-25. Boebert, a conservative firebrand who is typically in line with Trump, opted to defy the party andjoinwith Democrats in chasing the release of the Epstein files. Not even a meeting in the White House Situation Room could talk her away from her position.

A final press conference proved to be a gut punch to many lawmakers who were watching from their offices.

"We are fighting for the children," said survivor Haley Robson, who held up a photograph of herself as a young girl. "Choose the survivors. Choose the children."

"None of us here signed up for this political warfare," added survivor Wendy Avis. "We never asked to be dragged into battles between people who never protected us in the first place."

Another survivor, Jena-Lisa Jones, spoke directly to Trump. "I beg you, President Trump, please stop making this political. It is not about you, President Trump," she said into the camera. "I voted for you, but your behavior on this issue has been a national embarrassment."

Staring down defeat, Trump retreated. Although he continued to call it a "hoax," he publicly gave Republicans permission to vote for the release; only one voted against the measure.

The legislation cleared the Senate hours later unanimously. And Trump signed it into law that evening.

All the while, stunned survivors were on the Hill watching every development come at break-neck speed. "We never thought in a million years that it was going to move to the Senate as fast as it moved to the Senate," Hersh said.

Still, the next move is one controlled by the Justice Department, and this is one that takes its cues directly from the White House. Both Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patelsaidearlier this year that there was nothing else noteworthy worth releasing. But now Congress—and Trump—have ordered them to release "all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials" by next week.

The devil is in the details. If Bondi chooses to argue that they're still investigating Epstein-related manners, it could sidestep the prescribed transparency. Similarly, they could skirt disclosures in the name of protecting survivors. "We don't know how things shake out. I'll be very candid with you in telling you that this period of waiting is really distressing on the survivors," Hersh says. "They know what has come out. They know what hasn't come out."

On top of that, the survivors could find themselves in the coming days flipping through page after page of government documents that are just blocks of blacked-out material. Hersh is ready for that possibility, too. "If we get pages of redaction," she says, "you can be sure that our work will not be done."

Make sense of what matters in Washington.Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter.

Write toPhilip Elliott atphilip.elliott@time.com.

How Epstein's Victims Fought Trump and Found Each Other

Lauren Hersh speaks during a rally in support of the victims of Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 03, 2025 Credit - Andrew ...

 

VINCE JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com