Trump administration removes three spyware-linked executives from sanctions list

By Raphael Satter

WASHINGTON, Dec 30 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration has lifted sanctions on three executives tied to the spy software consortium Intellexa, according to a notice ​published to the U.S. Treasury's website.

The move partially reverses the imposition of sanctions ‌last year by then-President Joe Biden's administration on seven people tied to Intellexa. The Treasury Department at the time ‌described the consortium, launched by former Israeli intelligence official Tal Dilian, as "a complex international web of decentralized companies that built and commercialized a comprehensive suite of highly invasive spyware products."

A Treasury spokesman declined to comment.

A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that the removal "was done as part of ⁠the normal administrative process in response ‌to a petition request for reconsideration." The official added that each of the individuals had "demonstrated measures to separate themselves from the Intellexa Consortium."

Intellexa representatives ‍did not immediately respond to email messages requesting comment.

The notice said sanctions were lifted on Sara Hamou, whom the U.S. government accused of providing managerial services to Intellexa, Andrea Gambazzi, whose company was alleged by ​the U.S. government to have held the distribution rights to the Predator spyware, and ‌Merom Harpaz, described by U.S. officials as a top executive in the consortium.

Gambazzi, Hamou and Harpaz did not immediately reply to messages sent to them directly or to their representatives. Dilian, who remains on the sanctions list, did not respond to messages seeking comment.

The Intellexa consortium's flagship "Predator" spyware is at the center of a scandal over the alleged surveillance of a journalist, a ⁠prominent opposition figure and dozens of others in Greece, ​while in 2023 a group of investigative news outlets ​reported that the Vietnamese government had tried to hack members of the U.S. Congress using Intellexa's tools.

Dilian has previously denied any involvement or wrongdoing in the ‍Greek case, and has ⁠not commented publicly on the attempted hacking of U.S. lawmakers.

In its initial wave of sanctions issued in March of last year, the U.S. government accused Intellexa of enabling "the ⁠proliferation of commercial spyware and surveillance technologies" to authoritarian regimes and alleged that its software had been used "in an ‌effort to covertly surveil U.S. government officials, journalists, and policy experts."

(Reporting by Raphael ‌Satter; Editing by Edmund Klamann and Raju Gopalakrishnan)

Trump administration removes three spyware-linked executives from sanctions list

By Raphael Satter WASHINGTON, Dec 30 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration has lifted sanction...
Florida woman facing murder charge in death of ailing mother. Was it mercy?

A Florida woman who told investigators she had discussed assisted suicide with her ailing motherhas been arrested on a murder chargein the death of the ailing 97-year-old woman.

Martha Jo Blake, 66, is facing a first-degree murder in the death of Patricia Blake after the Palm Beach County Medical Examiner's Office ruled that the elder Blake's injuries were inconsistent with a natural death.

Autopsy findings indicate the elder Blake, whose body was found on Dec. 26 in the family's Greenacres-area home, was suffocated or strangled, according to her daughter's arrest report. The doctor performing the autopsy found that the 97-year-old had a fresh neck fracture, an internal hemorrhage on both sides of her neck and an indication that something had been placed over her face, the arrest report said.

The elder Blake suffered persistent illnesses, including Parkinson's disease and a thyroid disorder.

Investigators say that the younger Blake told them that her mother wanted to die because of her health issues and that she previously had discussed assisted suicide with her mother's primary care physician in Maine, where the practice is legal.

Blake also told investigators that her mother was deemed ineligible for Maine's assisted-suicide program because she did not have a terminal illness. She indicated she and her mother had discussed the option of suicide by taking pills but determined they did not have any that were lethal enough, authorities said.

An affidavit obtained by USA TODAY does not specify whether Blake denies or admits to wrongdoing but says she told investigators that she last saw her mother alive the night before she was found.

A judge assigned a public defender to represent her. The county Public Defender's Office has a policy of not commenting on active cases.

Where is assisted suicide legal?

Although what happened to Patricia Blake is unclear, the case raises questions over ongoing debate about assisted suicide.

Some states in the U.S. have moved to pass so-called "Death with Dignity" laws that allow for assisted suicide. Such laws are found worldwide but remain controversial.

Assisted suicide is legal in Washington, D.C., and 12 states: California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, according to Death with Dignity, a group that supports assisted-suicide laws.

The practice is illegal in Florida.

Several states that have legalized assisted suicide have guardrails in place to ensure the decision meets ethical and legal requirements. Commonly, patients must be at least 18 years old, a resident of the state in which they are seeking care and have a terminal illness with a prognosis of six months or less.

The following states are considering legalizing the practice: Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina and Pennsylvania, according to Death with Dignity.

Terminally ill people and affected family members supporting an assisted dying bill going through Parliament in the U.K. stand with posters in London, on Dec. 12, 2025.

More about the history of assisted suicide laws

Oregon was the first state to pass laws supporting assisted suicide. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act went into effect in 1997, according to Death with Dignity.

Illinois andDelawarewere the latest states to legalize assisted suicide in 2025.

The law in Delaware allows terminally ill patients who have six months or less to live to request and receive medication that will "end the individual's life in a humane and dignified manner," according to reporting byThe New Journal, part of the USA TODAY Network.

Around the world the practice is legal in Canada,nineEuropean countries andthreeLatin American countries, according toDignity in Dying, a London-based group that advocates in support of legalizing the practice.

Beatriz Gelos, who suffers from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), is helped to lift her foot into a wheelchair at the nursing home where she lives, in Montevideo, Uruguay, on Oct. 10, 2025. After two decades living with ALS, Beatriz Gelos was hoping that Uruguay's Senate would pass a euthanasia bill under consideration. The nation passed the law.

Pope Leo XIV weighs in on Illinois legalizing assisted suicide

Pope Leo XIV, a native of Chicago, weighed in on his home state passing the controversial legislation.

Leo told reporters in Italy that he had directly expressed his disapproval of the legislation toGov. JB Pritzker.

"We were very clear about the necessity to respect the sacredness of life, from the very beginning to the very end," Leotold reportersat Castel Gandolfo, near Rome. "Unfortunately … he decided to sign that bill. I'm very disappointed about that. I would invite all people, especially on these Christmas feast days, to reflect upon the nature of human life, the goodness of human life."

Pope Leo XIV looks on after delivering the traditional Christmas Day Urbi et Orbi speech to the city and the world from the main balcony of St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on Dec. 25, 2025.

Michael Loria is a senior reporter for USA TODAY.Julius Whigham II is a criminal justice and public safety reporter for The Palm Beach Post.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Was it mercy? Daughter faces murder charge in 97-year-old mom's death

Florida woman facing murder charge in death of ailing mother. Was it mercy?

A Florida woman who told investigators she had discussed assisted suicide with her ailing motherhas been arrested on a mu...
Hiker killed in fall on California mountain was 19-year-old 'avid outdoorsman'

(This story was updated to add new information.)

One ofthree hikers found deadafter an unsuccessful rescue attempt on Southern California's Mount Baldy has been identified as a 19-year-old whose family says he was an avid outdoorsman and that they are "destroyed" by his loss.

Marcus Alexander Muench Casanova, a 19-year-old resident of Seal Beach, was identified as one of the three male hikers who died amid windy conditions on the snow-covered mountain earlier this week, the San Bernardino County Coroner said on Wednesday, Dec. 31.

The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Coroner said it's working to identify the other two hikers.

Casanova's body was found Monday, but dangerous winds delayed recovery efforts until Tuesday. Friends say he fell about 500 feet near Devil's Backbone, a trail that lures many hikers and mountaineers to the San Gabriel mountain's highest peak.

The teenager's family issued a statement Wednesday, calling him "an incredibly sweet and empathetic young man."

"We are destroyed by the loss of our beloved Marcus," they wrote. "He was a graduate of Los Alamitos High, a freshman at Santa Clara University's business school, and an avid sailor and outdoorsman ... It is difficult to explain the pain and anguish we are going through and ask for privacy as we try to find our way."

Authorities said they responded to a request at about 11:30 a.m. on Dec. 29 to locate an injured 19-year-old male hiker near the Devil's Backbone trail, who'd reportedly fallen approximately 500 feet. During an aerial search, authorities located the injured hiker and two others. However, due to severe winds, the helicopter was unable to complete the rescue safely, authorities said.

Severe winds continued to hamper another rescue effort later that evening, during which an air medic confirmed all three hikers were dead. The helicopter was unable to complete the recovery efforts, county officials said.

Is Mount Baldy still closed?

The Mount Baldy area of the San Gabriel Mountains istemporarily closeduntil 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday, Dec. 31, according to the Angeles National Forest.

San Bernardino County Sheriff-Coroner Shannon Dicus said the temporary closure is "necessary to prevent additional emergencies and protect lives."

"The tragic loss of life on Mt. Baldy and repeated rescue responses highlight how dangerous current conditions are, even for experienced hikers," Dicus said. "Weather and terrain conditions remain extremely dangerous and unpredictable, posing a significant risk to both the public and Search and Rescue personnel."

Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her atpbarraza@usatodayco.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Teenage hiker killed in fall on California's Mt. Baldy was 'beloved'

Hiker killed in fall on California mountain was 19-year-old 'avid outdoorsman'

(This story was updated to add new information.) One ofthree hikers found deadafter an unsuccessful rescue attem...
US Coast Guard searches for survivors after strike on suspected drug vessels

By Idrees Ali and Jasper Ward

WASHINGTON, Dec 31 (Reuters) - The United States Coast Guard is searching for survivors of a U.S. military strike against a convoy of suspected drug vessels in ​the Pacific Ocean, U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

President Donald Trump's administration has carried out more than ‌30 strikes against suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific since September in a campaign that has killed at least 110 ‌people.

In a statement, the U.S. military's Southern Command said the military had carried out a strike against three vessels.

"Three narco-terrorists aboard the first vessel were killed in the first engagement. The remaining narco-terrorists abandoned the other two vessels, jumping overboard and distancing themselves before follow-on engagements sank their respective vessels," Southern Command wrote on X.

Southern Command said later ⁠on Wednesday that it had carried ‌out a strike on two vessels. It did not indicate where the strikes were carried out but said five people were killed as result.

U.S. SEARCHING FOR 8 SURVIVORS: OFFICIAL

A ‍U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said eight people had abandoned their vessels and were being searched for.

The Coast Guard told Reuters it had deployed a C-130 aircraft to look for survivors and was working with vessels in the ​area.

This is not the first time there have been survivors of a U.S. strike under the Trump ‌administration. In October, two survivors were repatriated to their home countries after surviving a U.S. military strike.

Later that month, Mexican authorities launched a search and rescue effort after another U.S. strike left a survivor. That individual was not found.

The decision to strike the vessels but not the survivors comes after it was revealed that during a September attack, the U.S. military carried out a follow-on strike against a suspected drug vessel that had ⁠two survivors on it.

The lethal strikes on drug vessels are part ​of a broader campaign that the Trump administration says is aimed ​at cutting off the supply of illegal drugs. Legal experts and Democratic lawmakers have questioned the legality of the strikes.

The strikes come amid a pressure campaign against Venezuelan President ‍Nicolas Maduro's government and a ⁠massive U.S. military buildup in the region.

Trump said on Monday the U.S. had "hit" an area in Venezuela where boats are loaded with drugs, marking the first known time Washington has carried out land operations ⁠in Venezuela.

Officials said the land strike was not carried out by the U.S. military and Trump has previously said he has ‌authorized the CIA to carry out covert operations in Venezuela.

(Reporting by Idrees Ali. Additional reporting by ‌Jasper Ward; Editing by Rod Nickel and Raju Gopalakrishnan)

US Coast Guard searches for survivors after strike on suspected drug vessels

By Idrees Ali and Jasper Ward WASHINGTON, Dec 31 (Reuters) - The United States Coast Guard is searching for surv...
A distorted female face; a voter at a voting booth; a mother holds her baby. (NBC News; Getty Images)

As the country prepares to ring in the new year, new state laws will take effect around the country on a host of issues, including the use of artificial intelligence in health care and elections, paid family and medical leave and rising medical insurance costs.

Some states are looking for ways to soften the blow of higher health care premiums as Affordable Care Act tax subsidies expire after Congress failed to extend them. And on the verge of the coming year's midterm elections, a slew of more restrictive voting laws are taking effect.

Here are some of the laws that go live in 2026:

Deepfakes in elections, AI misuse in health care

Thirty-eight states passed legislation this year to deal with the explosive growth of artificial intelligence, including on such topics as preventing the misuse of AI in elections and regulating how the technology disperses medical information, according to theNational Conference of State Legislatures.

AI will continue to be a top issue for states despite President Donald Trump'sexecutive orderin December seeking to limit state regulations on AI, said the group's CEO, Tim Storey.

Trump issued his executive order — which aimed to prevent a piecemeal, state-level approach to AI regulation in favor of "minimally burdensome national policy" for the use of the technology — after Congress was unable to pass legislation over the past year. As a result, it lacks the strength that legislation would provide to rein in state-level actions given that Congress has the exclusive power to pre-empt state laws under the Constitution.

"States have taken the lead, as they have in so many issues," Storey said at a recent news briefing. "AI is the big one."

In the absence of federal legislation, several states have taken action, including on the issues of so-called deepfakes in elections and AI as a medical resource.

Californiapassed legislationbarring AI developers and businesses from giving patients the impression that they are interacting with licensed health care professionals when they are really speaking with chatbots. Oregon enactedsimilar legislationpreventing AI programs from using the title "nurse" when they give medical advice.

Elsewhere,MontanaandSouth Dakotapassed laws this year that now require disclosures about using deepfakes in elections — measures that could come into play during next year's midterms.

Deepfakes, which are images, video or audio that are digitally altered to create false representations of people's statements or actions, have been used to cause confusion in state and national elections. During the 2024 presidential election, for example,NBC News reportedthat a political consultant used AI to create a robocall impersonating President Joe Biden, telling New Hampshire Democrats not to vote in the primary.

Congress has yet to pass legislation to prohibit deepfake content that could mislead voters during elections.

Paid family and medical leave

Maine,DelawareandMinnesotawill have paid family and medical leave policies going intoeffect in 2026, joining several other states that already provide such benefits. Maryland, Vermont and Washington also passed legislation expanding or amending existing paid family leave policies, with the latter state's changes taking effect this coming year. Paid family and medical leave allows employees to receive wages when they take leaves of absence for medical reasons, give birth or take care of family members.

Minnesota state Sen. Alice Mann, a physician who is a member of the state's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, sponsored the state's paid leave bill. She said witnessing her patients having to choose between taking care of themselves or loved ones and missing paychecks pushed her to back the legislation.

"I see people every single day who struggle. People are left with the choice of taking care of themselves, their family members, their new baby and not getting a paycheck anymore," Mann said. "And that's not an option that the rest of the world has to face."

Whilefederal lawprovides up to 12 weeks of unpaid job protection for people in need of medical or caretaking leave, the U.S. is the onlydeveloped economywithout paid parental or medical leave. It's also one of the only countries that don't provide paid sick leave at anational level.

Mann said that while Minnesota's legislation was passed in 2023, time was needed before it was implemented for people to actually know that the bill existed and understand how it works. That involved a $5 million public information campaign to educate "employers and community groups on what this policy is, what it does and how you participate," she said.

Delaware's and Maine's policies, which were passed in 2022 and 2023, respectively, also go into effect this coming year.

"It's a very popular policy, again, because we're all human beings, for crying out loud, and if it wasn't popular, we wouldn't be the only country left without it, right?" Mann said. "It is sustainable. It is something that we all use. And so I hope, I expect, that other states will see this, realize this and move to have their own policies in place."

Lapsing Obamacare subsidies

All 50 states will face rising health care costs starting in January after Congress was unable to pass legislation to extend expiring Obamacare premium subsidies before the end of the year.

In an August special session, Colorado became one of the few states toenact legislationaimed at softening the blow of the rising premiums, dedicating $100 million to offset premium hikes in the state's health care exchange.

State Rep. Kyle Brown, a Democrat who sponsored the bill, said the $100 million will serve as "a bridge" for 2026, ensuring that Colorado has funds to sustain some subsidizing of its health care exchange and "cushion the blow" from the lapse in federal subsidies.

"Before we passed the bill, people's premiums on average were expected to go up by 175% in Colorado. We passed the bill, and now they're only going up by 100%," Brown said. "Which is still like 'yeah, instead of tripling, they're doubling.' But it could have been worse."

According to KFF, a health policy research group, Affordable Care Act premium payments are likely to more than double because of the expiring subsidies. In Colorado, premiums for about 225,00 people will increase by anaverage of 101%, according to the state Insurance Division.

Brown said that he had hoped Congress would extend the Obamacare subsidies but that he came to the realization that the funds weren't coming through after having watched the U.S. government shut down for six weeks last fall — the longest federal funding lapse in the country's history — as Democratic and Republican lawmakers deadlocked over the issue. Rising health care prices and the high cost of living overall are expected to be top issues in the 2026 midterms.

"It feels like states are on their own. We don't have a willing partner in the federal government anymore, and so we have to do what we can to take care of our folks and make health care as affordable and accessible as possible," Brown said.

Stricter voting laws

This past year, 20 states passed 37 bills to restrict voting access and elections, according to theVoting Rights Lab, a nonprofit organization that tracks voting- and election-related legislation and aims to expand ballot access. That's the most since 2021, it said.

Meanwhile, 23 states passed 51 bills intended to improve voting and elections, the group found, saying that is the fewest such measures since it started tracking state legislation.

Kansas and North Dakotaeliminated grace periodsfor mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving afterward, and eight states passed legislation to restrict or eliminate alternatives to photo ID as proof of voter registration, according to the Voting Rights Lab.

Many of the states that passed such bills might have been influenced byTrump's executive orderin March that pushed for broad changes in how the U.S. conducts its elections, said Chris Vasquez, director of legislative tracking at the Voting Rights Lab.

"I think the main thrust of the story of the year is sort of Trump in March issuing this executive order," Vasquez said.

The order aimed to require that people provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote and required mail-in ballots to be sent in before Election Day. While the proof-of-citizenship requirement wasblocked in U.S. District Court in Washington as an executive branch overreach, certain states have passed legislation mirroring other policies in the executive order.

"We did see 27 states introduce some sort of restrictive proof-of-citizenship legislation this year, which is triple what we saw in the previous legislative session," Vasquez said. "That, for the most part, wasn't successful. But then, where you did see some more activity was on the mail ballot deadline side."

In 2026, he said, Vasquez will be keeping an eye onstate redistrictingand a relatedSupreme Court casethat could limit the scope of the Voting Rights Act as harbingers of what could develop at the state level, including efforts to protect against further voting restrictions.

"I think, especially looking at the Supreme Court potentially really curtailing the ability of plaintiffs to bring Voting Rights Act claims in federal court, these state voting rights acts are essentially something to keep an eye on into potential work against potentially voter suppressive laws," he said.

New laws in 2026 target AI and deepfakes, paid leave and rising Obamacare premiums

As the country prepares to ring in the new year, new state laws will take effect around the country on a host of issues, including the use ...
Department of Justice is reviewing more than 5.2 million documents related to Jeffrey Epstein

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of Justice has expanded its review of documents related to the convicted sex offenderJeffrey Epsteinto 5.2 million as it also increases the number of attorneys trying to comply with a law mandating release of the files, according to a person briefed on a letter sent to U.S. Attorneys.

The figure is the latest estimate in theexpanding review of case fileson Epstein and his longtime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell that has run more than a week past a deadline set in law by Congress.

The Justice Department has more than 400 attorneys assigned to the review, but does not expect to release more documents until Jan. 20 or 21, according to the person briefed on the letter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it.

The expanding scope of the disclosure and the additional legal firepower committed to it showed how the Epstein file investigation will continue to occupy significant attention in Congress and the White House, almost ensuring that it remains a potent political force as the new year rolls toward midterm elections.

The White House did not dispute the figures laid out in the email, and pointed to a statement from Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, who said the administration's review was an "all-hands-on-deck approach."

Blanche said Wednesday that lawyers from the Justice Department in Washington, the FBI, the Southern District of Florida, and the Southern District of New York are working "around the clock" to review the files. The additional documents and lawyers related to the case were first reported by The New York Times.

"We're asking as many lawyers as possible to commit their time to review the documents that remain," Blanche said. "Required redactions to protect victims take time, but they will not stop these materials from being released."

Still, Attorney GeneralPam Bondiis facing pressure from Congress after the Justice Department's rollout of information has lagged behind the Dec. 19 deadline to release the information.

"Should Attorney General Pam Bondi be impeached?" Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who helped lead the effort to pass the law mandating the document release, asked on social media this week.

Democrats also are reviewing their legal options as they continue to seize on an issue that has caused cracks in the Republican Party and, at times,flummoxed President Donald Trump's administration.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said on social media that the latest figures from the Department of Justice "shows Bondi, Blanche, and others at the DOJ have been lying to the American people about the Epstein files since day one" and pointed out that the documents released so far represented a fraction of the total.

What's expected next

A late January release of documents would put the Department of Justice more than a month behind the deadline set in law, but some key lawmakers appeared willing to let the process play out before trying to take direct action against the Trump administration.

Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who also led the effort to pass the law requiring the release, told The Associated Press that the Justice Department's expanding review showed that the law is working.

"We are willing to give DOJ a few extra weeks to comply, provided they release the survivors' statements to the FBI naming the other rich and powerful men who abused them or covered up and the prosecution memos about charges that were dropped against Epstein and co-conspirators," he said. "When all the information comes out, this will shock the conscience of the nation."

Massie has also said that he wants to see the release of statements that victims gave to the FBI. He has claimed that those could disclose the names of influential business figures and political donors who were involved or complicit in Epstein's abuse.

The pair has also argued that the expanding disclosure is evidence that more people were involved besides Epstein and Maxwell.

What could the files mean for the midterms?

The Trump administration has already struggled to move past the Epstein files for the better part of last year. While it's not clear what else will be shown in the files, it will almost certainly give Democrats continued fodder to continue to seize on the issue.

So far, Democrats, even though they are in the minority, have forced Congress to act on an issue that has caused splits in Trump's political base.

Atranche of documentsreleased just before Christmas showed that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet in the 1990s, when they had a friendship before a falling out. But the documents revealed little new information about their relationship. The initial release of documents also showed severalphotos of former President Bill Clintonwith women whose faces were blacked out.

Republicans on the House Oversight Committee have honed in on the connections to Clinton and areseeking to force himand former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to appear for a deposition in January.

Still,Democrats are trying to showthat the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files shows that it cannot be trusted and is more concerned about the welfare of the rich and famous than working-class voters.

"Unlike the President, we don't care who's in the files," said Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the oversight panel, on social media. "Anyone that's involved in the abuse of women and girls should be held accountable."

Department of Justice is reviewing more than 5.2 million documents related to Jeffrey Epstein

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of Justice has expanded its review of documents related to the convicted sex offenderJef...
A distorted female face; a voter at a voting booth; a mother holds her baby. (NBC News; Getty Images)

As the country prepares to ring in the new year, new state laws will take effect around the country on a host of issues, including the use of artificial intelligence in health care and elections, paid family and medical leave and rising medical insurance costs.

Some states are looking for ways to soften the blow of higher health care premiums as Affordable Care Act tax subsidies expire after Congress failed to extend them. And on the verge of the coming year's midterm elections, a slew of more restrictive voting laws are taking effect.

Here are some of the laws that go live in 2026:

Deepfakes in elections, AI misuse in health care

Thirty-eight states passed legislation this year to deal with the explosive growth of artificial intelligence, including on such topics as preventing the misuse of AI in elections and regulating how the technology disperses medical information, according to theNational Conference of State Legislatures.

AI will continue to be a top issue for states despite President Donald Trump'sexecutive orderin December seeking to limit state regulations on AI, said the group's CEO, Tim Storey.

Trump issued his executive order — which aimed to prevent a piecemeal, state-level approach to AI regulation in favor of "minimally burdensome national policy" for the use of the technology — after Congress was unable to pass legislation over the past year. As a result, it lacks the strength that legislation would provide to rein in state-level actions given that Congress has the exclusive power to pre-empt state laws under the Constitution.

"States have taken the lead, as they have in so many issues," Storey said at a recent news briefing. "AI is the big one."

In the absence of federal legislation, several states have taken action, including on the issues of so-called deepfakes in elections and AI as a medical resource.

Californiapassed legislationbarring AI developers and businesses from giving patients the impression that they are interacting with licensed health care professionals when they are really speaking with chatbots. Oregon enactedsimilar legislationpreventing AI programs from using the title "nurse" when they give medical advice.

Elsewhere,MontanaandSouth Dakotapassed laws this year that now require disclosures about using deepfakes in elections — measures that could come into play during next year's midterms.

Deepfakes, which are images, video or audio that are digitally altered to create false representations of people's statements or actions, have been used to cause confusion in state and national elections. During the 2024 presidential election, for example,NBC News reportedthat a political consultant used AI to create a robocall impersonating President Joe Biden, telling New Hampshire Democrats not to vote in the primary.

Congress has yet to pass legislation to prohibit deepfake content that could mislead voters during elections.

Paid family and medical leave

Maine,DelawareandMinnesotawill have paid family and medical leave policies going intoeffect in 2026, joining several other states that already provide such benefits. Maryland, Vermont and Washington also passed legislation expanding or amending existing paid family leave policies, with the latter state's changes taking effect this coming year. Paid family and medical leave allows employees to receive wages when they take leaves of absence for medical reasons, give birth or take care of family members.

Minnesota state Sen. Alice Mann, a physician who is a member of the state's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, sponsored the state's paid leave bill. She said witnessing her patients having to choose between taking care of themselves or loved ones and missing paychecks pushed her to back the legislation.

"I see people every single day who struggle. People are left with the choice of taking care of themselves, their family members, their new baby and not getting a paycheck anymore," Mann said. "And that's not an option that the rest of the world has to face."

Whilefederal lawprovides up to 12 weeks of unpaid job protection for people in need of medical or caretaking leave, the U.S. is the onlydeveloped economywithout paid parental or medical leave. It's also one of the only countries that don't provide paid sick leave at anational level.

Mann said that while Minnesota's legislation was passed in 2023, time was needed before it was implemented for people to actually know that the bill existed and understand how it works. That involved a $5 million public information campaign to educate "employers and community groups on what this policy is, what it does and how you participate," she said.

Delaware's and Maine's policies, which were passed in 2022 and 2023, respectively, also go into effect this coming year.

"It's a very popular policy, again, because we're all human beings, for crying out loud, and if it wasn't popular, we wouldn't be the only country left without it, right?" Mann said. "It is sustainable. It is something that we all use. And so I hope, I expect, that other states will see this, realize this and move to have their own policies in place."

Lapsing Obamacare subsidies

All 50 states will face rising health care costs starting in January after Congress was unable to pass legislation to extend expiring Obamacare premium subsidies before the end of the year.

In an August special session, Colorado became one of the few states toenact legislationaimed at softening the blow of the rising premiums, dedicating $100 million to offset premium hikes in the state's health care exchange.

State Rep. Kyle Brown, a Democrat who sponsored the bill, said the $100 million will serve as "a bridge" for 2026, ensuring that Colorado has funds to sustain some subsidizing of its health care exchange and "cushion the blow" from the lapse in federal subsidies.

"Before we passed the bill, people's premiums on average were expected to go up by 175% in Colorado. We passed the bill, and now they're only going up by 100%," Brown said. "Which is still like 'yeah, instead of tripling, they're doubling.' But it could have been worse."

According to KFF, a health policy research group, Affordable Care Act premium payments are likely to more than double because of the expiring subsidies. In Colorado, premiums for about 225,00 people will increase by anaverage of 101%, according to the state Insurance Division.

Brown said that he had hoped Congress would extend the Obamacare subsidies but that he came to the realization that the funds weren't coming through after having watched the U.S. government shut down for six weeks last fall — the longest federal funding lapse in the country's history — as Democratic and Republican lawmakers deadlocked over the issue. Rising health care prices and the high cost of living overall are expected to be top issues in the 2026 midterms.

"It feels like states are on their own. We don't have a willing partner in the federal government anymore, and so we have to do what we can to take care of our folks and make health care as affordable and accessible as possible," Brown said.

Stricter voting laws

This past year, 20 states passed 37 bills to restrict voting access and elections, according to theVoting Rights Lab, a nonprofit organization that tracks voting- and election-related legislation and aims to expand ballot access. That's the most since 2021, it said.

Meanwhile, 23 states passed 51 bills intended to improve voting and elections, the group found, saying that is the fewest such measures since it started tracking state legislation.

Kansas and North Dakotaeliminated grace periodsfor mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving afterward, and eight states passed legislation to restrict or eliminate alternatives to photo ID as proof of voter registration, according to the Voting Rights Lab.

Many of the states that passed such bills might have been influenced byTrump's executive orderin March that pushed for broad changes in how the U.S. conducts its elections, said Chris Vasquez, director of legislative tracking at the Voting Rights Lab.

"I think the main thrust of the story of the year is sort of Trump in March issuing this executive order," Vasquez said.

The order aimed to require that people provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote and required mail-in ballots to be sent in before Election Day. While the proof-of-citizenship requirement wasblocked in U.S. District Court in Washington as an executive branch overreach, certain states have passed legislation mirroring other policies in the executive order.

"We did see 27 states introduce some sort of restrictive proof-of-citizenship legislation this year, which is triple what we saw in the previous legislative session," Vasquez said. "That, for the most part, wasn't successful. But then, where you did see some more activity was on the mail ballot deadline side."

In 2026, he said, Vasquez will be keeping an eye onstate redistrictingand a relatedSupreme Court casethat could limit the scope of the Voting Rights Act as harbingers of what could develop at the state level, including efforts to protect against further voting restrictions.

"I think, especially looking at the Supreme Court potentially really curtailing the ability of plaintiffs to bring Voting Rights Act claims in federal court, these state voting rights acts are essentially something to keep an eye on into potential work against potentially voter suppressive laws," he said.

New laws in 2026 target AI and deepfakes, paid leave and rising Obamacare premiums

As the country prepares to ring in the new year, new state laws will take effect around the country on a host of issues, including the use ...

 

VINCE JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com