Children read at ABC Learning Center Inc. in Minneapolis on December 30, 2025, one of the day care centers featured in a recent viral video. - Renee Jones Schneider/The Minnesota Star Tribune/Getty Images

Minnesota child care centers at the heart of widespread fraud allegations fueled by a viral video were operating as expected when visited by investigators, the state Department of Children, Youth, and Families said in a news release Friday.

"Children were present at all sites except for one – that site, was not yet open for families for the day when inspectors arrived," the agency said.

The agency gathered evidence and initiated further review, noting the investigation into four centers was ongoing, the report stated.

The report comes days afterYouTube content creator Nick Shirley, who has created anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim videos in the past, posted a viral video in which he claimed to find widespread fraud at Somali-run child care centers.

Thevideo, which includes limited evidence for the creator's allegations, has received 3 million views on YouTube as of Friday and gained traction after being reposted by Vice President JD Vance and former Department of Government Efficiency le ader Elon Musk.

The conservative activist's 42-minute video posted the day after Christmas quickly spread, promptingstepped up immigration enforcement,frozen federal fundsand morebiting rhetoricagainst the Somali community from President Donald Trump.

The state Department of Children, Youth, and Families on Friday warned distribution of "unvetted or deceptive claims and misuse of tip lines can interfere with investigations, create safety risks for families, providers, and employers, and has contributed to harmful discourse about Minnesota's immigrant communities."

"DCYF remains committed to fact-based reviews that stop fraud, protect children, support families, and minimize disruption to communities that rely on these essential services," the report said.

After the video's release, Health and Human Services froze all child care payments to the state for review, as the FBI and Department of Homeland Security investigate allegations of fraud. CNN on Friday reached out to the FBI and DHS for comment on the preliminary state findings.

HHS, through a spokesperson, did not respond directly to the state findings Friday and reiterated its call for a more robust verification process to prevent fraud. "The onus is on the state to provide additional verification," said Andrew Nixon, HHS deputy assistant secretary for media relations.

The Trump administration has given Minnesota officials until next Friday to provide verifying information about providers and parents who receive federal funds for child care, according to an email sent Friday by DCYF to child care providers shared with The Associated Press. CNN has reached out to HHS and state officials for clarification.

In addition to demanding a state audit of the Minnesota day care centers featured in the video, Health and Human Services secretary Jim O'Neill said the agency would now require justification and receipts or photo evidence for all payments to states from the department's Administration of Children and Families.

At issue in allegations made in the controversial video were funds from theChild Care Assistance Program– known as CCAP – for 2025.

The report listed the amount of CCAP funding the centers in the video received in fiscal 2025, ranging from $470,000 to $3.6 million, and totaling over $17 million.

One center mentioned in the video has been closed since 2022, the report said.

CCAP does not take applications directly from day care centers. Instead, qualified working parents and other eligible caregivers who make less than the program's income limitapplydirectly to the state for assistance, which is paid to the day care center.

The accusations leveled in the video were the most recent in a series of fraud scandals involving state social service programs that provided meals for needy children during the pandemic, Medicaid housing assistance and other safety nets which benefit needy families.

The scandals go back nearly a decade and include allegations of fraud in the Somali community focused onFeeding Our Future, a nonprofit prosecutors said falsely claimed to provide meals to needy children during the Covid-19 pandemic. Federal charges were brought against dozens of people — most of them Somali — beginning in 2022.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Minnesota child care centers accused of wrongdoing were operating as expected, report says

Minnesota child care centers at the heart of widespread fraud allegations fueled by a viral video were operating as expected when visited b...
Prominent Jan. 6 defendants plan march to Capitol to mark 5 years since attack

Washington —The former leader of the far-right group the Proud Boys and other defendants convicted for crimes connected to the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol are set to return to Washington, D.C., for a march markingfive years since the attack.

The event is billed as a memorial march honoring Ashli Babbitt and four others who died on or after Jan. 6. Babbitt, a supporter of President Trump's, was shot and killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer while a mob attempted to breach the Speaker's Lobby outside the House chamber nearly five years ago. Brian Sicknick, a U.S. Capitol Police officer whodied after suffering two strokesafter he defended the Capitol during the assault, is also set to be honored.

Among those promoting the march is Enrique Tarrio, the former head of the Proud Boys who wasconvicted of chargesincluding seditious conspiracy for his role in the Jan. 6 attack andsentenced to 22 years in prison. Tarrio was among the more than 1,500 defendants convicted of Jan. 6-related crimes whoreceived clemencyfrom President Trump on his first day back in the White House in January 2025.

Tarrio announced the event on social media,writing on Xon Dec. 22 that it will be a "PATRIOTIC and PEACEFUL march."

"If you have any intention of causing trouble we ask that you stay home. This event will focus on one thing and one thing only…HER memory," Tarrio said, referencing Babbitt.

The march is set to begin at 11:45 a.m. at the Ellipse in front of the White House and end at the Capitol, according to Tarrio. The route follows the path that a mob of Mr. Trump's supporters took on Jan. 6 nearly five years ago. The presidentgave a speechto those gathered at the Ellipse to protest the results of the 2020 election and urged his supporters to march down to the Capitol, where the House and Senate convened to certify the election results.

Mr. Trump told the crowd that they would be "marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" and urged them to "fight like hell."

Alsopromoting the marchis Guy Reffitt, who was a member of the far-right militia group the Texas Three Percenters. He wasconvicted of five chargesstemming from the Capitol attack andsentenced to 87 months in prisonbefore he was pardoned by Mr. Trump.

The march involving Tarrio and Reffitt will be taking place alongside a hearing led by Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson and members of the House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack. Thompson chaired the panel, whichconcluded its work in late 2022andrecommended that Mr. Trump be prosecutedfor his conduct surrounding the riots.

The presidentfaced four criminal chargesbrought by former special counsel Jack Smith related to his alleged efforts to subvert the transfer of power after the 2020 election, but thecase was dismissedafter he won reelection in 2024.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffriessaid Mondaythat the hearing will examine "ongoing threats to free and fair elections posed by an out-of-control Trump administration, expose the election deniers who hold high-level positions of significance in the executive branch and detail the threats to public safety posed by the hundreds of violent felons who were pardoned on the President's first day in office."

"In the years since that disgraceful day, far-right Republicans in Congress have repeatedly attempted to rewrite history and whitewash the events of January 6th. Our country has been indelibly scarred," Jeffries, of New York, wrote in a letter to House Democrats.

Mr. Trump has downplayed the events of Jan. 6,calling it a "day of love,"and defended those who were charged for their conduct during the assault. More than 140 police officers wereinjured in the Capitol attack.

Video footage from the assault showed Babbitttrying to climb througha broken window as protesters attempted to gain entry into the Speaker's Lobby. Lawmakers had gathered in the chamber to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election and were evacuated as the mob of demonstrators breached the Capitol building.

Babbitt's familyfiled a $30 million wrongful death lawsuitagainst the U.S. government in January 2024, which the Trump administrationagreed to settlefor $5 million. Many of Mr. Trump's supporters and Capitol rioters have claimed that the police used unnecessary force against those who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6.

The U.S. Capitol Policeconducted an internal investigationinto the fatal shooting and concluded that the officer involved, Michael Byrd, acted lawfully and within department policy. The department said he potentially saved members of Congress and staff from "serious injury and possible death" from the rioters who had forced their way into the Capitol.

High school softball coach recruited ex-player in murder plot, prosecutors say

Mamdani signs executive orders undoing some of Eric Adams' orders

Trump now says he had CT scan, not MRI in October

Prominent Jan. 6 defendants plan march to Capitol to mark 5 years since attack

Washington —The former leader of the far-right group the Proud Boys and other defendants convicted for crimes connected t...
California ban on openly carrying guns is unconstitutional, court rules

By Nate Raymond

Jan 2 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday ruled that California's ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state was unconstitutional.

A panel of the ​San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided 2-1 with a gun owner in ‌ruling that the state's prohibition against open carry in counties with more than 200,000 people violated U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment right ‌to keep and bear arms.

About 95% of the population in California, which has had some of the nation's strictest gun-control laws, live in counties of that size.

U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, who was appointed by Republican President Donald Trump, said the Democratic-led state's law could not stand under the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 landmark gun ⁠rights ruling.

That decision, New York State Rifle & ‌Pistol Association v Bruen, was issued by the court's 6-3 conservative super-majority and established a new legal test for firearms restrictions. The test said they must be "consistent ‍with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."

VanDyke, whose opinion on Friday was joined by another Trump appointee, said the latest case "unquestionably involves a historical practice — open carry — that predates ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791."

He noted ​that more than 30 states generally allow open carry. California itself allowed citizens to carry handguns openly ‌and holstered for self-defense without penalty until 2012, he said.

"The historical record makes unmistakably plain that open carry is part of this Nation's history and tradition," VanDyke said.

The ruling partially reversed a 2023 decision by a lower-court judge who had rejected a 2019 challenge to the law by gun owner Mark Baird.

While the appeals court largely sided with Baird, it rejected his related challenge to California's licensing requirements in counties ⁠with fewer than 200,000 residents, which may issue open-carry permits.

Senior ​U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith, who was appointed by ​Republican former President George W. Bush, dissented, saying his colleagues "got this case half right" as all of California's restrictions complied with the Supreme Court's ruling.

Baird's lawyer had no immediate ‍comment. Spokespeople for California Attorney ⁠General Rob Bonta, whose office defended the state's ban, did not respond to a request for comment.

The 2022 Supreme Court ruling has prompted court cases nationwide challenging modern firearm restrictions, including in ⁠California.

A 9th Circuit panel in September 2024 upheld a California law that prohibits people with concealed-carry permits from carrying firearms ‌at several categories of "sensitive places" like bars, parks, zoos, stadiums and museums.

(Reporting by Nate Raymond ‌in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Cynthia Osterman)

California ban on openly carrying guns is unconstitutional, court rules

By Nate Raymond Jan 2 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday ruled that California's ban on openly carry...
Getty Stock photo of a laboratory technician preparing embryo cultivation plates.

NEED TO KNOW

  • An Oregon woman is alleging that her mother was mistakenly inseminated with another man's sperm

  • The now 44-year-old woman and her parents are suing the clinic after discovering two years ago that her father is not her biological dad

  • They are requesting $17 million in damages

An Oregon woman is alleging that her mother was mistakenly inseminated with another man's sperm.

According to court documents obtained by PEOPLE, the now 44-year-old woman — identified in the lawsuit as A.P. — is joined by her biological mother, known as C.W., and her father by marriage and birth, known as K.W., in suing Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and Providence Health & Services of Oregon for $17 million.

The threesome claims that C.W. and K.W. sought out fertility care and family planning at OHSU after being referred by their physician. However, they claim that during the process, the clinic mixed up K.W.'s sperm with another man's – known as R.W. in the lawsuit — and mistakenly gave her the wrong person's sperm.The Oregonianwas first to report the news.

Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

Getty Stock photo of a sperm bank.

C.W. and K.W. welcomed their daughter A.P. in December 1981 and raised her as their biological child, never thinking that something had happened at the hospital. R.W. and his partner also became pregnant and welcomed their child in November 1981.

A.P. did not discover that her father is not K.W. until two years ago, when she underwent genetic testing. According to the lawsuit, more genetic testing revealed that her biological father is R.W.

Now, the family claims that K.W. was "stripped entirely" of his biological fatherhood of his firstborn baby with his wife, C.W., and says he is permanently reminded of the violation against his family.

Getty Stock photo of a laboratory technician performing in vitro fertilization of a human egg.

C.W. claims she was also stripped of the bond of creating a shared life with her husband, and had to "bear the humiliation, discomfort, and physical distress" of carrying a pregnancy to term with another man's semen specimen. She says she suffered a "severe invasion of her personhood."

The family claims that A.P. is the "product of nonconsensual birth" and will endure doubt, frustration and confusion for the rest of her life. They also allege that the hospital knew of the mistake and "concealed the use of R.W.'s genetic material" and has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing.

Now, they are requesting $17 million in damages from the hospital. OSHU declined to comment when reached by PEOPLE.

Read the original article onPeople

Oregon Woman Claims Fertility Clinic Inseminated Her Mom with Wrong Man's Sperm in $17 Million Lawsuit

NEED TO KNOW An Oregon woman is alleging that her mother was mistakenly inseminated with another man's sperm The now 44-year-old woman...
Earthquake with 6.5 magnitude rattles southern and central Mexico killing 2

MEXICO CITY (AP) — A strongearthquakerattled southern and central Mexico on Friday, interrupting PresidentClaudia Sheinbaum's first press briefing of the new year as seismic alarms sounded and leaving at least two people dead.

The earthquake had a magnitude of 6.5 and its epicenter was near the town of San Marcos in the southern state of Guerrero near the Pacific coast resort of Acapulco, according toMexico's national seismological agency. There were more than 500 aftershocks.

The state's civil defense agency reported various landslides around Acapulco and on other highways in the state.

Guerrero Gov. Evelyn Salgado said that a 50-year-old woman living in a small community near the epicenter died when her home collapsed. Authorities also said that a hospital in Chilpancingo, Guerrero's capital, suffered major structural damage and various patients were evacuated.

Residents and tourists in Mexico City and Acapulco rushed into the streets when the shaking began. Mexico City Mayor Clara Brugada said that one person died after suffering an apparent medical emergency followed by a fall while evacuating a building.

The U.S. Geological Survey said the earthquake occurred at a depth of 21.7 miles (35 kilometers), 2.5 miles north-northwest of Rancho Viejo, Guerrero, which is in the mountains about 57 miles northeast of Acapulco.

Sheinbaum resumed her press briefing a short time after the quake.

José Raymundo Díaz Taboada, a doctor and human rights defender who lives on one of the peaks ringing Acapulco, said he heard a strong rumble noise and all the neighborhood dogs began barking.

"In that moment the seismic alert went off on my cellphone," he said, "and then the shaking began to feel strong with a lot of noise."

He said the shaking was lighter than in some previous quakes and he had prepared a backpack of essentials to be ready to leave as the aftershocks continued.

He said he had been unable to reach some friends who live along the Costa Chica southeast of Acapulco because communications were cut.

Earthquake with 6.5 magnitude rattles southern and central Mexico killing 2

MEXICO CITY (AP) — A strongearthquakerattled southern and central Mexico on Friday, interrupting PresidentClaudia Sheinba...
Prominent Jan. 6 defendants plan march to Capitol to mark 5 years since attack

Washington —The former leader of the far-right group the Proud Boys and other defendants convicted for crimes connected to the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol are set to return to Washington, D.C., for a march markingfive years since the attack.

The event is billed as a memorial march honoring Ashli Babbitt and four others who died on or after Jan. 6. Babbitt, a supporter of President Trump's, was shot and killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer while a mob attempted to breach the Speaker's Lobby outside the House chamber nearly five years ago. Brian Sicknick, a U.S. Capitol Police officer whodied after suffering two strokesafter he defended the Capitol during the assault, is also set to be honored.

Among those promoting the march is Enrique Tarrio, the former head of the Proud Boys who wasconvicted of chargesincluding seditious conspiracy for his role in the Jan. 6 attack andsentenced to 22 years in prison. Tarrio was among the more than 1,500 defendants convicted of Jan. 6-related crimes whoreceived clemencyfrom President Trump on his first day back in the White House in January 2025.

Tarrio announced the event on social media,writing on Xon Dec. 22 that it will be a "PATRIOTIC and PEACEFUL march."

"If you have any intention of causing trouble we ask that you stay home. This event will focus on one thing and one thing only…HER memory," Tarrio said, referencing Babbitt.

The march is set to begin at 11:45 a.m. at the Ellipse in front of the White House and end at the Capitol, according to Tarrio. The route follows the path that a mob of Mr. Trump's supporters took on Jan. 6 nearly five years ago. The presidentgave a speechto those gathered at the Ellipse to protest the results of the 2020 election and urged his supporters to march down to the Capitol, where the House and Senate convened to certify the election results.

Mr. Trump told the crowd that they would be "marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" and urged them to "fight like hell."

Alsopromoting the marchis Guy Reffitt, who was a member of the far-right militia group the Texas Three Percenters. He wasconvicted of five chargesstemming from the Capitol attack andsentenced to 87 months in prisonbefore he was pardoned by Mr. Trump.

The march involving Tarrio and Reffitt will be taking place alongside a hearing led by Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson and members of the House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack. Thompson chaired the panel, whichconcluded its work in late 2022andrecommended that Mr. Trump be prosecutedfor his conduct surrounding the riots.

The presidentfaced four criminal chargesbrought by former special counsel Jack Smith related to his alleged efforts to subvert the transfer of power after the 2020 election, but thecase was dismissedafter he won reelection in 2024.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffriessaid Mondaythat the hearing will examine "ongoing threats to free and fair elections posed by an out-of-control Trump administration, expose the election deniers who hold high-level positions of significance in the executive branch and detail the threats to public safety posed by the hundreds of violent felons who were pardoned on the President's first day in office."

"In the years since that disgraceful day, far-right Republicans in Congress have repeatedly attempted to rewrite history and whitewash the events of January 6th. Our country has been indelibly scarred," Jeffries, of New York, wrote in a letter to House Democrats.

Mr. Trump has downplayed the events of Jan. 6,calling it a "day of love,"and defended those who were charged for their conduct during the assault. More than 140 police officers wereinjured in the Capitol attack.

Video footage from the assault showed Babbitttrying to climb througha broken window as protesters attempted to gain entry into the Speaker's Lobby. Lawmakers had gathered in the chamber to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election and were evacuated as the mob of demonstrators breached the Capitol building.

Babbitt's familyfiled a $30 million wrongful death lawsuitagainst the U.S. government in January 2024, which the Trump administrationagreed to settlefor $5 million. Many of Mr. Trump's supporters and Capitol rioters have claimed that the police used unnecessary force against those who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6.

The U.S. Capitol Policeconducted an internal investigationinto the fatal shooting and concluded that the officer involved, Michael Byrd, acted lawfully and within department policy. The department said he potentially saved members of Congress and staff from "serious injury and possible death" from the rioters who had forced their way into the Capitol.

High school softball coach recruited ex-player in murder plot, prosecutors say

Mamdani signs executive orders undoing some of Eric Adams' orders

Trump now says he had CT scan, not MRI in October

Prominent Jan. 6 defendants plan march to Capitol to mark 5 years since attack

Washington —The former leader of the far-right group the Proud Boys and other defendants convicted for crimes connected t...
D.C. pipe bomb suspect must stay in pre-trial custody, judge rules

WASHINGTON — A federal magistrate judge on Friday ordered that the Virginia man accused ofplanting pipe bombs in the nation's capital on Jan. 5, 2021,remains detained ahead of his trial, determining that he posed a "potential danger" to the public.

Federal prosecutors allegethat Brian Cole, 30,planted explosive devices at the Republican and Democratic parties' headquarters nearly five years ago. He's been in custody since his Dec. 4 arrest, when he was charged with transporting an explosive device and attempted malicious destruction by means of explosive materials.

"Although home incarceration and a GPS monitor would provide some check against Mr. Cole's ability to carry out any menacing or dangerous conduct in the community, the Court is simply not satisfied these conditions rise to the necessary level," Magistrate Judge Matthew Sharbaugh wrote in his ruling.

"This is particularly true based on the severity of the potential danger Mr. Cole is alleged to pose, given his alleged persistent acquisition and retention of so-called 'bombmaking parts,' and given his reported penchant and capacity to create explosive devices and deploy them in public settings."

"If the plan had succeeded, the results could have been devastating: creating a greater sense of terror on the eve of a high-security Congressional proceeding, causing serious property damage in the heart of Washington, D.C., grievously injuring DNC or RNC staff and other innocent bystanders, or worse," Sharbaugh wrote.

Cole has not yet entered a plea in the case.

Cole's attorneys wanted him to be released into the custody of his grandmother. The government objected to his release, describing him as showing a pattern of "comprehensive deception" and saying it did not trust him to keep to the conditions of his release.

In a federal court filing on Tuesday, Cole's attorneys said he has beendiagnosed with autismspectrum disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The filing described his diagnosis as a mild form of autism.

Defense attorney Mario Williams told the judge on Tuesday that Cole has spent the last five years following the same routine as he typically does and has kept the same job with his family's bail bonds business over several years with no attempt to flee. Cole's autism and OCD disorder is partially why he follows the same routines every day, Williams said.

Cole's attorneys argued that the government has not presented any evidence that suggests evasive conduct or resistance to law enforcement.

But in a motion filed Sunday, the government alleged that Cole wore a face mask and gloves the night he planted the bombs, as well as wiping down the bombs with disinfectant. The government said Cole also performed a factory reset of his phone more than 900 times between December 2020 and the day he was arrested.

Federal prosecutors urged the judge to keep Cole in detention, alleging that Cole felt "extreme acts of violence" were justified because of hisdislike of both political parties. The motion said that the man told FBI agents that "something just snapped" after he had watched "everything getting worse."

He directed his ire at the Democratic and Republican parties because "they were in charge," Cole told agents, according to the government filing.

Prosecutors confirmed in the filing Sunday that Cole told agents he thought it looked like "something was wrong" with the election and that he followed the situation on platforms such as YouTube and Reddit. According to prosecutors, Cole said that Trump supporters who believed the election was being "tampered with" shouldn't be called "conspiracy theorists," "bad people," "Nazis," or "fascists."

He is alleged to have told agents that he didn't align politically with his family members and that he didn't tell them he was "going to a protest in support of [then President] Trump."

Cole was allegedly inspired to use pipe bombs by his interest inThe Troubles in Northern Ireland, the sectarian war between Catholics and Protestants that escalated into violence in the 1970s. The violence, which included bombing attacks, went on for three decades.

According to the government's filing, Cole did not test the devices before planting them and they failed to go off as planned.

"Ultimately, it was luck, not lack of effort, that the defendant failed to detonate one or both of his devices and that no one was killed or maimed due to his actions," the government filing said. "Indeed, the defendant admitted that he set both devices to detonate 60 minutes after he placed them."

Gary Grumbach reported from Washington, D.C. Doha Madani reported from New York City.

D.C. pipe bomb suspect must stay in pre-trial custody, judge rules

WASHINGTON — A federal magistrate judge on Friday ordered that the Virginia man accused ofplanting pipe bombs in the nati...

 

VINCE JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com