French tech company Capgemini says selling US subsidiary

PARIS, Feb 1 (Reuters) - French tech company Capgemini said ​on Sunday it was ‌selling its U.S. subsidiary Capgemini Government ‌Solutions.

Capgemini has been under pressure in recent days to explain a contract it signed ⁠with U.S ‌immigration enforcement agency ICE, amid growing criticism of ‍ICE following weeks of protests against U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown.

"Capgemini ​considered that the usual legal ‌constraints imposed in the United States on contracting with federal entities conducting classified activities did not allow the Group ⁠to exercise appropriate ​control over ​certain aspects of this subsidiary's operations in order to ‍ensure alignment ⁠with the Group's objectives," it said in a ⁠statement.

(Reporting by Sybille de La Hamaide ‌and Betrand Boucey; Editing ‌by Alexander Smith)

French tech company Capgemini says selling US subsidiary

PARIS, Feb 1 (Reuters) - French tech company Capgemini said ​on Sunday it was ‌selling its U.S. subsidiary Capgemini Gove...
India's budget boosts infrastructure spending while vowing fiscal discipline

NEW DELHI (AP) — Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government presented its annual budget to Parliament on Sunday, focusing on sustaining the country's economic growth despitevolatilefinancial markets and trade uncertainty.

Associated Press

In a speech introducing the budget, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the governments plans to boost investments in infrastructure and domestic manufacturing while sticking to fiscal prudence.

The budget for the 2026-27 financial year, which starts April 1, comes as major economies grapple with high interest rates,geopolitical tensionsand renewed protectionism that has weighed on global trade and capital flows.

India has so far withstood hightariffsimposed by the U.S., largely by frontloading some exports and diversifying shipments to new destinations.

The finance ministry's economic survey, which was released on Thursday ahead of the budget, forecast India's economy to grow between 6.8% and 7.2% in the next fiscal year buoyed by increasing domestic consumption.

Despite plans for higher spending in some areas, the government reiterated its commitment to fiscal consolidation, targeting a deficit of 4.3% of the GDP next year, down slightly from the 4.4% of GDP deficit the government is on track to achieve in the fiscal year ending inMarch.

Here are some key takeaways from the budget:

No populist giveaways, focus on structural reforms

Sitharaman offered no populist giveaways, saying New Delhi will focus on building resilience at home while positioning itself more firmly in the global supply chain.

Last year's budget wooed the salaried middle class with steep tax cuts after Modi secured a landslide victory in the national polls.

"India will continue to take confident steps towards Viksit Bharat (Developed India), balancing ambition with inclusion," Sitharaman said.

The focus will be on structural reforms, mainly in the manufacturing sector, while also stepping up investments in niche industries such as biopharma andartificial intelligence, she added.

Manufacturing and supply chain resilience

Advertisement

The budget call for the government's capital expenditure for the next fiscal year to reach 12.2 trillion rupees ($133 billion), mainly on infrastructure, up from 11.2 trillion rupees last year.

This comes at a time when many advanced economies are cutting back public investments due to high debt and tightened monetary policy. India will use state spending to prop up growth.

Sitharaman said the government will scale up manufacturing in seven strategic sectors including biopharma, semiconductors, electronics components and rare earth magnets. To reduce import dependency, three chemical production parks will be set up.

Recognizing global concerns over slowing job creation, especially in manufacturing, the budget announced additional credit support and a growth fund for micro, small and medium enterprises.

Financial market reforms aim to attract capital

Sitharaman outlined steps to deepen India's financial markets, including measures to strengthen the corporate bond market and ease certain rules for foreign investors.

With global capital increasingly selective amid higher interest rates in the West, emerging markets are competing for stable and long-term investment.

"I propose a comprehensive review of the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) Rules to create a more contemporary, user-friendly framework for foreign investments, consistent with India's evolving economic priorities," Sitharaman said.

Budget promises rail development

Sitharaman said India plans to promote environmentally sustainable travel with seven high-speed rail corridors between key cities such as Mumbai-Pune, Hyderabad-Bengaluru, Pune-Hyderabad, and Chennai-Bengaluru.

For cargo movement, an unspecified number of new dedicated freight corridors will be set up and 20 new waterways operationalized over the next five years, she said.

Dedicated freight corridors will also be set up for rare earths to promote mining, processing, research and manufacturing.

In addition, she said that the government will develop ecologically sustainable mountain and coastal trails to promote ecological tourism.

India's budget boosts infrastructure spending while vowing fiscal discipline

NEW DELHI (AP) — Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government presented its annual budget to Parliament on Sunday, focus...
OPEC+ set to keep planned oil output pause for March as prices jump, sources say

By Olesya Astakhova and Ahmad Ghaddar

MOSCOW/LONDON, Feb 1 (Reuters) - OPEC+ is likely to keep its planned pause on oil output increases for March when it ​meets later on Sunday, three OPEC+ delegates told Reuters, even after crude prices ‌hit six-month highs on concern the U.S. could launch a military strike on OPEC member Iran.

The meeting of eight ‌OPEC+ members comes as Brent crude closed near $70 a barrel on Friday, close to a six-month high of $71.89 reached on Thursday, despite speculation that a supply glut in 2026 would push prices down.

The eight producers - Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Iraq, ⁠Algeria and Oman - raised production ‌quotas by about 2.9 million barrels per day from April through December 2025, roughly 3% of global demand.

They then froze further planned increases ‍for January through March 2026 because of seasonally weaker consumption.

Sunday's meeting is due to start at 1330 GMT, two sources said. It is not expected to take any decisions for output policy beyond March, ​sources said on Friday.

OPEC+ includes the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, plus Russia ‌and other allies. The full OPEC+ pumps about half of the world's oil.

A separate OPEC+ panel called the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee is also scheduled to meet on Sunday, delegates said. The JMMC does not have decision-making authority on production policy.

U.S. President Donald Trump is weighing options against Iran that include targeted strikes on security forces and leaders ⁠to inspire protesters, multiple sources said on Thursday.

Washington has ​imposed extensive sanctions on Tehran to choke off ​its oil revenue, a crucial source of state funding.

Both the U.S. and Iran have since signalled willingness to engage in dialogue, but Tehran on ‍Friday said its defence ⁠capabilities should not be included in any talks.

Oil prices have also been supported by supply losses in Kazakhstan, where the oil sector has suffered a series of ⁠disruptions in recent months. Kazakhstan said on Wednesday it was restarting the huge Tengiz oilfield in stages.

(Reporting ‌by Olesya Astakhova in Moscow, Alex Lawler and Ahmad Ghaddar in London. Writing ‌by Alex Lawler, Editing by Alexander Smith)

OPEC+ set to keep planned oil output pause for March as prices jump, sources say

By Olesya Astakhova and Ahmad Ghaddar MOSCOW/LONDON, Feb 1 (Reuters) - OPEC+ is likely to keep its planned pause...
Besieged by gang violence, Palestinian citizens in Israel demand more security

KAFR YASIF, Israel (AP) — Nabil Safiya had taken a break from studying for a biology exam to meet a cousin at a pizza parlor when a gunman on a motorcycle rode past and fired, killing the 15-year-old as he sat in a black Renault.

Associated Press Raweah Safiya palms a poster bearing the image of her son, Nabil, who was shot dead in last November in a case of mistaken identity, a victim of gang-related violence, in Kafr Yasif, northern Israel, Sunday, Jan. 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Mahmoud Illean) Raweah Safiya consoles one of her children as he cries over the death of his brother, Nabil Safiya, at the family's home in Kafr Yasif, northern Israel, Sunday, Jan. 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Mahmoud Illean) Palestinian citizens of Israel participate in a rally calling for greater security amid rising crime in their communities, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Saturday, Jan. 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg) Palestinian citizens of Israel participate in a rally calling for greater security amid rising crime in their communities, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Saturday, Jan. 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg) Palestinian citizens of Israel participate in a rally calling for greater security amid rising crime in their communities, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Saturday, Jan. 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg)

Israel Palestinian Citizens Violence

The shooting — which police later said was a case of mistaken identity — stunned his hometown of Kafr Yasif,long besieged,like many Palestinian towns in Israel, by a wave of gang violence and family feuds.

"There is no set time for the gunfire anymore," said Nabil's father, Ashraf Safiya. "They can kill you in school, they can kill you in the street, they can kill you in the football stadium."

Theviolence plaguing Israel's Arab minorityhas become an inescapable part of daily life. Activists have long accused authorities of failing to address the issue and say that sense has deepened under Israel's current far-right government.

One out of every five citizens in Israel is Palestinian. The rate of crime-related killings among them is more than 22 times higher than that for Jewish Israelis, while arrest and indictment rates for those crimes are far lower. Critics cite the disparities as evidence of entrenched discrimination and neglect.

A growing number of demonstrations are sweeping Israel. Thousands marched in Tel Aviv late Saturday to demand action, while Arab communities have gone on strike, closing shops and schools.

In November, after Nabil was gunned down, residents marched through the streets, students boycotted their classes and the Safiya family turned their home into a shrine with pictures and posters of Nabil.

The outrage had as much to do with what happened as with how often it keeps happening.

"There's a law for the Jewish society and a different law for Palestinian society," Ghassan Munayyer, a political activist from Lod, a mixed city with a large Palestinian population, said at a recent protest.

An epidemic of violence

SomePalestinian citizenshave reached the highest echelons of business andpoliticsin Israel. Yet many feel forsaken by authorities, with their communities marked by underinvestment and high unemployment that fuels frustration and distrust toward the state.

Nabil was one of a record 252 Palestinian citizens to be killed in Israel last year, according to data from Abraham Initiatives, an Israeli nongovernmental organization that promotes coexistence and safer communities. The toll continues to climb, with at least 26 additional crime-related killings in January.

Walid Haddad, a criminologist who teaches at Ono Academic College and who previously worked in Israel's national security ministry, said that organized crime thrives off weapons trafficking and loan‑sharking in places where people lack access to credit. Gangs also extort residents and business owners for "protection," he said.

Based on interviews with gang members in prisons and courts, he said they can earn anywhere from thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars, depending on whether the job is torching cars, shooting at buildings or assassinating rival leaders.

"If they fire at homes or people once or twice a month, they can buy cars, go on trips. It's easy money," Haddad said, noting a widespread sense of impunity.

The violence has stifled the rhythm of life in many Palestinian communities. In Kafr Yasif, a northern Israel town of 10,000, streets empty by nightfall, and it's not uncommon for those trying to sleep to hear gunshots ringing through their neighborhoods.

Prosecutions lag

Last year, only 8% of killings of Palestinian citizens led to charges filed against suspects, compared with 55% in Jewish communities, according to Abraham Initiatives.

Advertisement

Lama Yassin, the Abraham Initiatives' director of shared cities and regions, said strained relations with police long discouraged Palestinian citizens from calling for new police stations or more police officers in their communities.

Not anymore.

"In recent years, because people are so depressed and feel like they're not able to practice day-to-day life ... Arabs are saying, 'Do whatever it takes, even if it means more police in our towns,'" Yassin said.

The killings have become a rallying cry for Palestinian-led political parties after successive governments pledged to curb the bloodshed with little results. Politicians and activists see the spate of violence as a reflection of selective enforcement and police apathy.

"We've been talking about this for 10 years," said Knesset member Aida Touma-Suleiman.

She labeled policing in Palestinian communities "collective punishment," noting that when Jews are victims of violence, police often set up roadblocks in neighboring Palestinian towns,flood areas with officersand arrest suspects en masse.

"The only side that can be able to smash a mafia is the state and the state is doing nothing except letting (organized crime) understand that they are free to do whatever they want," Touma-Suleiman said.

Many communities feel impunity has gotten worse, she added, under National Security MinisterItamar Ben-Gvir, who with authority over the police haslaunchedaggressive and visible campaigns against other crimes,targeting protestsand pushing for tougher operations in east Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank.

Israeli police reject allegations of skewed priorities, saying that killings in these communities are a top priority. Police also have said investigations are challenging because witnesses don't always cooperate.

"Investigative decisions are guided by evidence, operational considerations, and due process, not by indifference or lack of prioritization," police said in a statement.

Unanswered demands

In Kafr Yasif, Ashraf Safiya vowed his son wouldn't become just another statistic.

He had just gotten home from his work as a dentist and off the phone with Nabil when he learned about the shooting. He raced to the scene to find the car window shattered as Nabil was being rushed to the hospital. Doctors there pronounced him dead.

"The idea was that the blood of this boy would not be wasted," Safiya said of protests he helped organize. "If people stop caring about these cases, we're going to just have another case and another case."

Authorities said last month they were preparing to file an indictment against a 23-year-old arrested ina neighboring townin connection with the shooting. They said the intended target was a relative, referring to the cousin with Nabil that night.

And they described Nabil as a victim of what they called "blood feuds within Arab society."

At a late January demonstration in Kafr Yasif, marchers carried portraits of Nabil and Nidal Mosaedah, another local boy killed in the violence. Police broke up the protest, saying it lasted longer than authorized, and arrested its leaders, including the former head of the town council.

The show of force, residents said, may have quashed one protest, but did nothing to halt the killings.

__ Hazboun reported from Jerusalem.

Besieged by gang violence, Palestinian citizens in Israel demand more security

KAFR YASIF, Israel (AP) — Nabil Safiya had taken a break from studying for a biology exam to meet a cousin at a pizza par...
Does the Constitution protect begging? Supreme Court asked to decide

WASHINGTON – Two years after theSupreme Courtsaid cities canpunish homeless peopleforsleeping in public places,Alabama wants the high court to end protections for public begging.

USA TODAY

The constitutional issues are different. In 2024, the courtsaidfining or jailing someone for sleeping outside when there are no available shelter beds doesn't violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

In Alabama'spending appeal, the state argues begging was widely criminalized at the start of the nation so should not be protected speech under the First Amendment.

While the legal strategy may be a longshot, Alabama hopes the justices will want to hear its appeal for one of the same reasons an Oregon city's sleeping ban was taken up: local governments' pleas for help with the nation's growing homelessness problem.

More:In major decision, Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless camps

"Our cities cannot manage this crisis without the full measure of their traditional police powers," Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall told the court in an appealbackedby 19 GOP attorneys general from other states.

`Today it is me, tomorrow it could be you'

Alabama has asked the court to decide whether the Constitution prevents broad bans on panhandling, such as two Alabama laws successfully challenged so far by Jonathan Singleton, a homeless resident of Montgomery, Alabama.

Singleton was cited six times for violating a state law against soliciting contributions, including for holding a sign that read "HOMELESS. Today it is me, tomorrow it could be you" while standing in the grass near a highway exit.

Violators can be punished with fines up to $500 and three months in jail under one anti-begging law and with fines starting at up to $100 and 10 days in jail under a law against soliciting contributions from people in cars.

More:20 US states sue to block Trump from restricting homelessness funding

A homeless man holds a sign on the streets of Providence, Rhode Island.

Alabama's begging bans blocked by lower courts

After Singleton filed a class action lawsuit in 2020, lower courts blocked enforcement of the laws.

Advertisement

The Atlanta-based 11thCircuit Court of Appeals' 2025 ruling cited its previous decision in a different case from Florida that begging is speech protected by the First Amendment.

A three-judge panel said Alabama's laws are different from a ban on panhandling on Fort Lauderdale's beaches that the appeals court upheld in 1999 because Fort Lauderdale's restrictions weren't citywide.

In an appeal that includes several references to the Supreme Court's 2024 decision on outdoor sleeping bans, Alabama argues cities and states need more leeway to address panhandling amid the homelessness crisis and a "dramatic growth" in public demand for dealing with begging.

"At the founding, States commonly prohibited idleness, wandering about with no course of business or fixed residence, begging in the streets, and the like," Marshall wrote. "The basic theory, inherited from the English, was to distinguish those who could work (but refused) from those who could not."

More:A growing American crisis is affecting more than 1 million students

With his dog Molly, Chris Steininger knows the harsh and unforgiving business of being homeless. Panhandling is his fulltime job in Columbus, Ohio, and his dog Molly is the lure for many to give him the $100 per day he needs to pay for housing, as shown in this 2025 photo.

Courts have said begging is protected by First Amendment

Lawyers for Singleton, some of whom work for the Southern Poverty Law Center and the National Homelessness Law Center, counter that the historic laws Alabama cites "criminalized the conduct of voluntary idleness, not the communicative aspect of begging."

And even if they did cover begging, Singleton's lawyers said, First Amendment protections aren't determined by what laws were on the books at a single moment in time.

That's why Alabama's argument cuts against the position taken by courts across the country and against the Supreme Court's "long and unbroken line of precedent recognizing that speech seeking charitable relief is protected by the First Amendment," his lawyers wrote.

When initiating the lawsuit in 2020, the Southern Poverty Law CentersaidAlabama "should dedicate more resources to housing, shelter, and healthcare that would meet those needs rather than jailing or ticketing people that ask for help."

Alabama's appeal is scheduled to be considered by the Supreme Court at a closed-door conference on Feb. 20. Four of the nine justices must want to hear a case for it to be accepted for review.

The court rejects the vast majority of the thousands of appeals it receives each year.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Alabama asks Supreme Court to end protections for panhandling

Does the Constitution protect begging? Supreme Court asked to decide

WASHINGTON – Two years after theSupreme Courtsaid cities canpunish homeless peopleforsleeping in public places,Alabama wa...
Shutdown? What shutdown? For DC, just another day at the office

Shutdown?What shutdown?

USA TODAY

There was a time when shutting down the federal government seemed like a big deal. Thirty years ago, the firestorm over a 21-day shutdown revived Bill Clinton's presidency and grievously wounded Newt Gingrich's speakership.

But the partial shutdown that started at midnight on Jan. 31 created less buzz over the weekend than the early and almost-entirely-negativereviews of Netflix's "Melania," the first lady's entry into documentary filmmaking.

President Donald Trump (C-L) speaks during a meeting of the Cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House on January 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is holding the meeting as the Senate plans to hold a vote on a spending package to avoid another government shutdown, however Democrats are holding out for a deal to consider funding for the Department of Homeland Security. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting of the Cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House on January 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is holding the meeting as the Senate plans to hold a vote on a spending package to avoid another government shutdown, however Democrats are holding out for a deal to consider funding for the Department of Homeland Security. (L-R) U.S. Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Eric Turner, and U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins look on during a meeting of the Cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House on January 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is holding the meeting as the Senate plans to hold a vote on a spending package to avoid another government shutdown, however Democrats are holding out for a deal to consider funding for the Department of Homeland Security. A name card for U.S. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem sits on the table during a meeting of the Cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House on January 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is holding the meeting as the Senate plans to hold a vote on a spending package to avoid another government shutdown, however Democrats are holding out for a deal to consider funding for the Department of Homeland Security. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting of the Cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House on January 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is holding the meeting as the Senate plans to hold a vote on a spending package to avoid another government shutdown, however Democrats are holding out for a deal to consider funding for the Department of Homeland Security. (L-R) White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Eric Turner, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and U.S. Vice President JD Vance look on during a meeting of the Cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House on January 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is holding the meeting as the Senate plans to hold a vote on a spending package to avoid another government shutdown, however Democrats are holding out for a deal to consider funding for the Department of Homeland Security. U.S. Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on January 29, 2026. (L-R) U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Vice President JD Vance and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi look on during a meeting of the Cabinet in the Cabinet Room of the White House on January 29, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is holding the meeting as the Senate plans to hold a vote on a spending package to avoid another government shutdown, however Democrats are holding out for a deal to consider funding for the Department of Homeland Security. President Donald Trump speaks alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio (L) and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (R) during a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on January 29, 2026. President Donald Trump listens during a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on January 29, 2026. Also pictured from L/R are Attorney General Pam Bondi, US secretary of Interior Doug Burgum, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and US Vice President JD Vance.

As shutdown threat looms, Trump meets with Cabinet

This even though parts of the Pentagon, the Health and Human Services Department and the Transportation Department, left without regular funding, were ordered to begin an "orderly shutdown" for a least a few days. Late Friday, the Senate passed five appropriations bills to fund them but the House can't begin to consider the measure until it reconvenes on Monday.

Passage there is considered likely but not guaranteed. Democratic leaders aren't yet on board; some Republican hardliners are expressing opposition.

Left unsettled is more money for the Homeland Security Department. Those funds are caught in a fierce battle over Democratic proposals, now backed by some Republicans, to impose limits on the behavior of the ICE agents whose aggressive tactics in Minneapolis have left protestersRenee GoodandAlex Prettidead.

Under the deal reached by the Trump administration and the Senate, negotiators would have another two weeks before a shutdown over that looms again.

What once seemed like a sign of a government-in-crisis is now viewed by many in Washington as just another day at the office. Shutdowns have lost their power to shock unless clear catastrophe ensues − say,disrupting air travelfor millions of Americans − or records are broken.

Travelers in Houston face delays as TSA operations are impacted by the government shutdown, waiting at least three hours to get through security.

That's not to say shutdowns are free, for federal workers or Americans generally.

Besides overwhelmed TSA lines at some airports, the last shutdown resulted in the furlough of about 670,000 government employees. Members of thearmed forceswere required to report for duty, but some military families turned to food banks to tide over their families.

Areport by the Congressional Research Servicereleased Jan. 29 estimated that the six-week shutdown cost the U.S. economy about $11 billion in lost spending and productivity.

The current shutdown has a long way to go before it challenges the record that one set last fall. That had been prompted by Democrats' demand to extend enhanced subsidies for those who buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act.

An issue, by the way, that is still being debated.

Do you trust your government?

One reason shutdowns have often become a dog-bites-man story is that what once was seen as a shocking last resort has beenrelatively common.

Advertisement

In the half-century since the federal budget process was overhauled in 1976, there have now been 23 of them, hitting every administration except those of presidents George W. Bush andJoe Biden.

Ronald Reagan had the most, at eight, but each for only a few days. Trump has scored the longest. The previous record of 35 days, set during his first term over funding for his proposal to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, has now been supplanted by the 43-day shutdown in his second term.

Another reason is that the federal government is now viewed by many as so routinely dysfunctional that budget stalemates are seen as just one more example of a broader breakdown.

The U.S. Capitol dome rises above a pile of snow, as Congress works to resolve a dispute over immigration enforcement and avert a looming partial government shutdown, in Washington, D.C., U.S., January 29, 2026.

In aPew Research Center pollreleased in December, just 17% of Americans said they trusted the government in Washington to do what is right most or all of the time.

When that question was first asked by the National Election Study in 1958, an overwhelming 73% of Americans held that level of trust in their government.

Views of the government have gone up and down in the generations since then. They eroded during the Vietnam War and Watergate scandal, then rebounded during rosy economic times in the mid-1980s and late 1990s. But a spike after the Sept. 11 terror attacks in 2011 collapsed in the wake of the Iraq War and financial meltdown in 2008.

Today's reading, with only about one in six Americans expressing faith in government, is one of the lowest over the past seven decades.

When it's easier to sign your name

Washington has also set public expectations low that action will be taken on, well, just about anything.

The119th Congress, which took office in January 2025, is on track to enact the fewest pieces of legislation of any in decades, according to statistics reported by GovTrack.us.

The bills Trump signed into law in 2025 included the sweeping tax-cut measure known as the One Big Beautiful Bill. But the president has imposed many of his most far-reaching policies not by passing laws but by signing arecord 228 executive orders− to impose stringent tariffs, order mass deportations, shake up federal agencies and deploy the National Guard to the streets of U.S. cities.

For Congress, funding the government, one of its fundamental tasks, has proven problematic.

Another shutdown?

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:For Trump and Congress, budget shutdown just another day in DC

Shutdown? What shutdown? For DC, just another day at the office

Shutdown?What shutdown? There was a time when shutting down the federal government seemed like a big deal. Thi...
NATO's ability to deter Russia has taken a hit with trans-Atlantic infighting

BRUSSELS (AP) — European allies and Canada are pouring billions of dollars into helping Ukraine, and they have pledged tomassively boost their budgetsto defend their territories.

But despite those efforts, NATO's credibility as a unified force under U.S. leadership has taken a huge hit over the past year as trust within the 32-nation military organization dissolved.

The rift has been most glaring over U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated threats toseize Greenland, a semiautonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark. More recently, Trump's disparaging remarks about his NATO allies' troops in Afghanistandrew another outcry.

While the heat on Greenlandhas subsidedfor now, the infighting has seriously undercut the ability of the world's biggest security alliance to deter adversaries, analysts say.

"The episode matters because it crossed a line that cannot be uncrossed," Sophia Besch from the Carnegie Europe think tank said in a report on the Greenland crisis. "Even without force or sanctions, that breach weakens the alliance in a lasting way."

The tensions haven't gone unnoticed in Russia, NATO's biggest threat.

Any deterrence of Russia relies on ensuring that President Vladimir Putin is convinced that NATO will retaliate should he expand his war beyondUkraine. Right now, that does not seem to be the case.

"It's a major upheaval for Europe, and we are watching it," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov noted last week.

Filling up the bucket

Criticized by U.S. leaders for decades over low defense spending, and lashed relentlessly under Trump, European allies and Canada agreed in July to significantly up their game and start investing 5% of their gross domestic product on defense.

The pledge was aimed at taking the whip out of Trump's hand. The allies would spend as much of their economic output on core defense as the United States — around 3.5% of GDP — by 2035, plus a further 1.5% on security-related projects like upgrading bridges, air and seaports.

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has hailed those pledges as a sign of NATO's robust health and military might. He recently said that "fundamentally thanks to Donald J. Trump, NATO is stronger than it ever was."

Though a big part of his job is to ensure that Trump does not pull the U.S. out of NATO, as Trump has occasionally threatened, hisflattery of the American leaderhas sometimes raised concern. Rutte has pointedly refused to speak about the rift over Greenland.

Article 5 at stake

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed in 1949 to counter the security threat posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and its deterrence is underpinned by a strong American troop presence in Europe.

The alliance is built on the political pledge that an attack on one ally must be met with a response from them all — the collective security guarantee enshrined inArticle 5of its rule book.

It hinges on the belief that the territories of all 32 allies must remain inviolate. Trump's designs on Greenland attack that very principle, even though Article 5 does not apply in internal disputes because it can only be triggered unanimously.

"Instead of strengthening our alliances, threats against Greenland and NATO are undermining America's own interests," two U.S. senators, Democrat Jeanne Shaheen and Republican Lisa Murkowski, wrote in a New York Times op-ed.

"Suggestions that the United States would seize or coerce allies to sell territory do not project strength. They signal unpredictability, weaken deterrence and hand our adversaries exactly what they want: proof that democratic alliances are fragile and unreliable," they said.

Even before Trump escalated his threats to seize control of Greenland, his European allies were never entirely convinced that he would defend them should they come under attack.

Trump has said that he doesn't believe the allies would help him either, and he recently drew more anger when he questioned the role of European and Canadian troops who fought and died alongside Americans in Afghanistan. The president later partially reversed his remarks.

In testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissedcriticism that Trump has undermined the alliance.

"The stronger our partners are in NATO, the more flexibility the United States will have to secure our interests in different parts of the world," he said. "That's not an abandonment of NATO. That is a reality of the 21st century and a world that's changing now."

A Russia not easily deterred

Despite NATO's talk of increased spending, Moscow seems undeterred. The EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said this week that "it has become painfully clear that Russia will remain a major security threat for the long term."

"We are fending off cyberattacks, sabotage against critical infrastructure, foreign interference and information manipulation, military intimidation, territorial threats and political meddling," she said Wednesday.

Officials across Europe have reported acts ofsabotageand mysteriousdrone flightsover airports and military bases. Identifying the culprits is difficult, and Russia denies responsibility.

In a year-end address, Rutte warned that Europe is at imminent risk.

"Russia has brought war back to Europe, and we must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured," he said.

Meanwhile in Russia, Lavrov said the dispute over Greenland heralded a"deep crisis"for NATO.

"It was hard to imagine before that such a thing could happen," Lavrov told reporters, as he contemplated the possibility that "one NATO member is going to attack another NATO member."

Russian state media mockedEurope's "impotent rage" over Trump's designs on Greenland, and Putin's presidential envoy declared that "trans-Atlantic unity is over."

Doubt about US troops

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is due to meet with his counterparts at NATO on Feb. 12. A year ago, he startled the allies by warning that America's security prioritieslie elsewhereand that Europe must look after itself now.

Security in the Arctic region, where Greenland lies, will be high on the agenda. It's unclear whether Hegseth will announce a new drawdown of U.S. troops in Europe, who are central to NATO's deterrence.

Lack of clarity about this has also fueled doubt about the U.S. commitment to its allies. In October, NATO learned that up to 1,500 American troops would be withdrawn from an area bordering Ukraine,angering ally Romania.

A report from the European Union Institute for Security Studies warned last week that although U.S. troops are unlikely to vanish overnight, doubts about U.S. commitment to European security means "the deterrence edifice becomes shakier."

"Europe is being forced to confront a harsher reality," wrote the authors, Veronica Anghel and Giuseppe Spatafora. "Adversaries start believing they can probe, sabotage and escalate without triggering a unified response."

NATO's ability to deter Russia has taken a hit with trans-Atlantic infighting

BRUSSELS (AP) — European allies and Canada are pouring billions of dollars into helping Ukraine, and they have pledged to...

 

VINCE JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com